To grow up in South Florida during the 1970s and 1980s, as I did, was not your typical American childhood experience. Back then the area was known as the most dangerous place in the country.
Carnage from the drug wars filled the local news long before Miami Vice became a hit TV show. By elementary school, my friends and I knew some of the lingo. A Colombian necktie was not a piece of clothing, but a gruesome execution method. When I was seven years old my barber was murdered in his shop, apparently over a drug deal.
It had been a long time since I thought much about those days. By chance I recently came across a fabulous documentary, Cocaine Cowboys by Miami filmmaker Billy Corben. Then last month a US Senate panel held a hearing on the UK bank HSBC Holdings and its ties to drug lords, money laundering, al-Qaeda and rogue nations such as Iran and North Korea.
Here is a bank with US$2.7 trillion of assets that flouted US laws for a decade, according to the July 17 report by the US Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. HSBC turned a blind eye to organized crime, Mexican drug cartels and overseas terrorism financiers and gave them access to the US banking system. HSBC main US regulator, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), for years tolerated its violations of anti-money laundering laws.
For this, HSBC and the OCC apologized. US Department of Justice fines are likely. It is an outrage HSBC has not had its US banking licenses revoked, assuming the Senate panel report is accurate — and there is no reason to believe it is not.
TRY THIS
Let us try out a novel idea: Banks that help drug cartels launder money and give cover to those tied to terrorism should be put out of business. Is that really so hard for everyone to agree on? Free markets have worked in the US because we have the rule of law. It is why so many investors from other countries want to do business here. When contracts are breached, courts can be accessed to enforce them. When individuals or companies commit crimes, they are supposed to be prosecuted and punished.
Except we have this mutant species of corporation called too-big-to-fail banks whose collapse might wreck the global economy. No financial institution in the US can survive a felony indictment. So these companies have become un-indictable, creating a perverse nonchalance regarding financial crimes. In 2010, Wachovia paid US$160 million to settle criminal allegations of laundering Mexican drug money. By then the bank had been bought by Wells Fargo & Co, and the justice department let it off with a deferred-prosecution deal. Usually the most that happens to management is someone resigns, as HSBC head of compliance, David Bagley, said he would at last month’s US Senate hearing.
What would it take for the government to really crack down on wrongdoing in the financial-services industry? What finally prompted the feds to do something about cocaine smuggling into South Florida long ago was the epidemic of violence it spawned.
A defining moment came in July 1979, when drug traffickers went on a shooting spree in broad daylight at the Dadeland Mall in Kendall, southwest of Miami. This was unprecedented. The gunmen arrived in a delivery van that had been converted into an armored personnel carrier. Two people were killed. Bystanders dove for cover. Cars in the parking lot were riddled with bullets from machine-gun fire.
CRIME SPREE
Attacks like that became frequent over the next few years. In 1979 there were 349 murders in South Florida, according to the Justice Department, triple the number of two years earlier. By 1981 murders had climbed to 621. The local police were outgunned, outnumbered, easily corrupted and often stoned.
Finally in 1982, then-US president Ronald Reagan formed a task force and devoted hundreds of additional federal agents to South Florida to restore law and order.
Then, too, the cartels’ enablers included dirty banks. As Corben film noted, in 1979 the Federal Reserve’s Miami branch reported a US$5 billion cash surplus — more than the country’s other Federal Reserve banks combined. One crucial difference, compared with today, was the drug banks in those days were relatively small. When an outfit such as Sunshine State Bank got busted, it did not threaten the economy.
In terms of stray bullets, Miami is a much safer place today. However, mainly what the US did was drive the cartels, the turf battles and the killings into Mexico, where the violence is out of mind for most Americans even while much of that country has turned into a narco-state.
Maybe if the bankers were the ones spraying machine-gun fire in the streets, that might spur the US government to take meaningful, punitive action. Short of that, you have to wonder if anything would. Too-big-to-fail is not merely an economic problem. It is a great moral failing of our society that poisons our democracy. Something has to give.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with