Taiwanese electronics companies have finally learned their lesson from the failure of their peers during previous economic downturns. Facing a bleak outlook, they have decided to no longer skimp on investing in new technologies.
Good for them. If they are determined to keep a good market position, they will need to do so. Good also for the national economy. Private investment, one of the key factors to stimulate an economy, should not decline. If private investment fell, it would be another blow to Taiwan’s GDP, which is forecast to grow a meager 2 percent this year. This weak outlook comes after the rate of decline in exports accelerated to a 5.4 percent annual contraction last quarter.
With machine imports shrinking at an annual rate of 8.85 percent last quarter, the Ministry of Economic Affairs said it can now only pin its hopes on local chipmakers and technology firms to grow its machine imports and private investment. During previous downcycles, slashing spending on new technologies and handing out pink slips were considered effective approaches by local firms to weather the tough times. It was an easy strategy. However, easy strategies can only provide short-term safe havens as has been reflected in Taiwan’s struggling LCD and memory chip industries.
Although global macroeconomic fragility has cast a dark shadow over Taiwan’s business outlook, local firms are not planning on significantly slashing capital spending in exchange for a quick respite. In order to achieve sustainable growth, they have instead decided to invest strategically and selectively for their future.
Because the global competitive landscape is changing dramatically, the old trick of simply cutting spending does not work anymore. Old dogs need new tricks to safeguard their turf against ever bigger new rivals.
The situation facing firms is becoming reminiscent of a scorched earth game. Companies have fewer options. They may either invest in an effort to earn big or cut spending on everything and hope that luck saves them from elimination.
Companies with a global remit, such as contract chipmaker Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSMC) and chip packager Advanced Semiconductor Engineering (ASE), feel the greatest pressure. This year, ASE plans to spend US$800 million buying more equipment to harness a new technology, which could substitute copper for gold in advanced chip packaging. Also betting on advanced technologies for future growth, TSMC retained its record-breaking level of capital spending at US$8.5 billion. This comes despite that fact that there are increasing signs that the global economy has made no significant progress since the 2008 and 2009 financial meltdown. Lackluster economic growth is weighing on consumer spending and bringing up inventory for TSMC’s clients.
Heavy investment in new technologies reversed a dramatic reduction in capital spending back in 2008. During that period, TSMC only budgeted US$1.8 billion for annual expenditure, down from US$2.8 billion in 2007.
Why is TSMC opting to adopt such a risky strategy during tough economic times? “The competitor landscape changed because our competitors changed,” TSMC chairman and CEO Morris Chang told investors last month.
Two, or three years ago, United Microelectronics and GlobalFoundries were the main competitors of TSMC, Chang said.
“Now, our competitors are Intel Corp and Samsung Co. They are more powerful and more intimidating than our old competitors,” Chang said.
The biggest headache for the TSMC chairman now is not how many jobs he must cut, but rather how the company can attract top global talent.
Whether these risky investments will bear fruit remains to be seen. However, at the very least, such investments may offer new business opportunities or even a chance to break the current deadlock.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with