Taiwan is highly prone to typhoons and flooding and this is why we have the Operation Regulations on the Suspension of Offices and Classes because of Natural Disasters (天然災害停止辦公及上課作業辦法). In the years that these regulations have been in effect, in order to avoid conflicts and public complaints, city and county governments have become inclined to announce the suspension of work when classes are suspended due to typhoons.
The main reason is that, as many people have commented, there is nobody to look after their children when classes are suspended. Suspending work when classes have been suspended is thus a response to the issue of Taiwan’s smaller families and family structure. However, as soon as work and classes are suspended on days when the weather turns out to be fine, people start complaining. They sometimes even direct their anger at the Central Weather Bureau (CWB), although such populist complaints ignore the technical limits of weather forecasting.
In such circumstances, city and county leaders often face a tough decision on whether to suspend work and classes. As a side effect, child safety is easily overlooked, especially as there are no safety regulations for protecting students from the dangers of natural disasters. The main point is that students, especially young children and toddlers, are the country’s future leaders and their safety is paramount.
For example, the last time classes and work were suspended in Taipei and New Taipei City (新北市) due to strong rain, the announcement did not come until after 9am, when people had already gone to work and school. Having parents pick up their children from school at this time could lead to even greater safety risks.
There are three main reasons why the government should draft new regulations to protect students and children.
First, students require special attention. Elementary-school children and infants are at greater physical risk of being injured on the way to and from class and on various modes of transport during a typhoon. Therefore, there should be looser criteria for suspending classes to avoid putting children in harm’s way.
Second, educational institutions have a responsibility to protect students. In addition to government departments, educational institutions — including public and private schools and kindergartens — all have a responsibility to guarantee student safety. Therefore, even when poor weather merits an official suspension of work and school, educational institutions cannot ignore their responsibility to guarantee student safety merely because they their work day has been cancelled. Put simply, when the weather becomes too extreme, it is a much safer option for students to stay temporarily at their schools and kindergartens. Staff at such places should not shirk their responsibility to protect the children.
Third, the various dangers students can face during a typhoon must be clarified. Educational institutions should consider the increased risks from stronger winds and heavy rain and what sort of protection students should be given on their way to and from school. The responsibility of educational institutions to guarantee student safety should be made clear in legal regulation.
It is the government’s responsibility to give comprehensive thought to these issues and devise regulations to protect student safety before, during and after a natural disaster. The government needs to devise clearer regulations for the procedure of class suspension in order to ensure student safety.
Yang Yung-nane is a professor of political science and director of the Graduate Institute of Political Economy at National Cheng Kung University.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with