A move to amend the Act for the Utilization and Transfer of Reserved Mountainous Land (山坡地保育利用條例) may have the best of intentions, but it should be firmly shut down. The last thing this nation needs is an amendment that would make it easier for anyone to access such land and convert it into more concrete — be it for a hotel, a resort or tea shop. Yet, adding more concrete to the landscape is what the measure is really about, whether the proponents want to admit it or not.
The law allows Aborigines to gain ownership of reserved mountainous lands if they first receive permission to rent or farm a piece of land which they then utilize for five consecutive years. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Jeng Tian-tsair (鄭天財), an Amis, thinks this is wrong because at present the restrictions apply only to Aborigines, so he wants to eliminate the waiting period entirely. That’s like throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
Opponents of his proposal say any moves making it easier to gain access to such lands would open the way for more developers and non-Aborigines to take over the land — and they are correct. Just look at what has happened to Alishan and Sun Moon Lake; most of the businesses there are owned and operated by non-Aborigines. While both areas milk Aboriginal culture and heritage to attract tourists, few of the economic benefits are actually reaped by Aboriginal residents.
All too often, government officials — at all levels — pay tribute to Taiwan’s Aboriginal tribes as national assets from a cultural point of view, but do little to protect these assets from assimilation efforts or invasive development, whether it be under the current or former KMT administration or the Democratic Progressive Party.
There are still too many ways for developers to evade restrictions on land use and build in predominantly Aboriginal areas. Just look at the farce that the Meiliwan Resort Village at Shanyuan Bay (杉原灣), Taitung County, has become — it is like a bad science fiction movie: “The development that cannot be killed.”
The developers thumbed their noses at the central government from the very beginning by starting construction before applying for an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). Even though the project’s construction permit and the EIA have since been ruled invalid in court, the Taitung County Government, which is a partner in the project, has ignored the rulings and allowed construction to continue. The Supreme Administrative Court ruled in January that the beachfront resort was guilty of procedural violations, and that the county government had failed to ask the developer to present evidence to prove that the project would not pollute the ocean — where the coral reefs are already under threat.
Over the past six years, there have been fervent protests by Aborigines, environmental activists and others over the resort, but still the work continues. What will it take to halt this project? It is obvious that the county government, having a vested interest, cannot be relied upon to do its job, and yet the central government appears oblivious.
While the fall-back rationale is that development will boost tourism and provide employment opportunities, the truth is that Aboriginal culture and traditions will be trampled on and the wealth will remain in non-Aboriginal hands.
Instead of amending the Act for the Utilization and Transfer of Reserved Mountainous Land to make it easier for Aborigines or non-Aborigines to rent or utilize the land, the legislators should be making it harder for everyone to gain access. Lawmakers should also pass amendments to beef up the Aboriginal Basic Act (原住民族基本法) to offer more protection to Aboriginal land, culture and lifestyles.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with