Gently, but firmly, the new commander of US forces in the Pacific has urged the South Koreans and Japanese to find a way to get past the demons of their history to forge a new and productive security posture.
Commander of the US Pacific Command Admiral Samuel Locklear, who assumed command in March, encouraged the governments in Seoul and Tokyo “to find a way past the political divide that stops them from recognizing the importance of information-sharing as it relates to the security environment.”
In an interview with several US reporters the admiral said he and Pacific Command should ensure that the South Korean and Japanese governments, both treaty allies of the US, “are aware of the military imperative of information sharing and working together if you want to build a productive security environment.”
Locklear had been asked what he and the US Pacific Command could do about the longstanding Korean-Japanese hostility that made relations between the two perhaps the weakest link in the US’ security stance in Asia. Earlier this month, the South Korean and Japanese governments negotiated an agreement to exchange information on issues such as the threat from North Korea. However, just before the pact was to be signed, virulent anti-Japanese protests erupted in Seoul and the signing was called off.
The bad blood between Korea and Japan is often attributed to the latter’s oppressive occupation of the former for 35 years, which ended with Japan’s surrender in World War II in 1945. However, the antagonism seems deeper than that. Now, 67 years later, anti-Japanese sentiment in South Korea appears to be stronger than fear of North Korea.
South Koreans seem envious of Japan’s economic, industrial and technological success and in schools, museums and historical sites, antagonism against Japan is relentlessly nurtured.
For their part, Japanese often seem insensitive to South Korean laments and have sometimes engaged in what can only be labeled clumsy diplomacy. Occasionally, right-wingers and nationalists contend that Korea benefited from Japanese rule and justify Japan’s imperial expansion as normal for that era of Western colonialism in Asia.
Some Americans with experience in Asia say that the US should insist that Japan and South Korea settle their differences for the sake of mutual security.
Michael McDevitt, a retired rear admiral, wrote several years ago that “the United States has invested little effort over the past decade in pressing both of its allies to overcome the past.”
Admiral Locklear sought to be optimistic: “I think we are seeing opportunities for them [South Korea and Japan] to be more closely aligned with each other. To some degree, economics will push them closer together. Security issues in the region will push them closer together. Many [in both nations] are concerned about North Korea and nuclear proliferation.”
For more than a decade, North Korea has been developing nuclear arms and has shown no sign of stopping.
Those nuclear weapons “will force them to get closer together,” the admiral said.
In addition, China and Russia have nuclear weapons aimed at Northeast Asia. The US has pledged to South Korea and Japan that the US nuclear umbrella extends over both nations. North Korea has also been attempting to develop long- range missiles to carry nuclear warheads.
Asked whether North Korea had built a missile that could hit Hawaii, 7,400km away, the admiral said: “They have not yet demonstrated that capability.”
However, Locklear suggested that his command was watching Pyongyang’s program intently.
“Homeland defense is my No. 1 mission,” he said.
Richard Halloran is a commentator in Hawaii.
The image was oddly quiet. No speeches, no flags, no dramatic announcements — just a Chinese cargo ship cutting through arctic ice and arriving in Britain in October. The Istanbul Bridge completed a journey that once existed only in theory, shaving weeks off traditional shipping routes. On paper, it was a story about efficiency. In strategic terms, it was about timing. Much like politics, arriving early matters. Especially when the route, the rules and the traffic are still undefined. For years, global politics has trained us to watch the loud moments: warships in the Taiwan Strait, sanctions announced at news conferences, leaders trading
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
The Executive Yuan and the Presidential Office on Monday announced that they would not countersign or promulgate the amendments to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) passed by the Legislative Yuan — a first in the nation’s history and the ultimate measure the central government could take to counter what it called an unconstitutional legislation. Since taking office last year, the legislature — dominated by the opposition alliance of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party — has passed or proposed a slew of legislation that has stirred controversy and debate, such as extending
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators have twice blocked President William Lai’s (賴清德) special defense budget bill in the Procedure Committee, preventing it from entering discussion or review. Meanwhile, KMT Legislator Chen Yu-jen (陳玉珍) proposed amendments that would enable lawmakers to use budgets for their assistants at their own discretion — with no requirement for receipts, staff registers, upper or lower headcount limits, or usage restrictions — prompting protest from legislative assistants. After the new legislature convened in February, the KMT joined forces with the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and, leveraging their slim majority, introduced bills that undermine the Constitution, disrupt constitutional
RSS