Chinese rights advocate Chen Guangcheng (陳光誠) says the Chinese government has quietly promised him it will investigate abuses he and his family suffered at the hands of local authorities, in a rare instance of Beijing bowing to the demands of an activist.
Beijing’s apparent willingness to look into Chen’s complaints is another sign that his gambit late last month — when the blind activist fled house arrest in his hometown for the US embassy and set off a diplomatic tussle — has succeeded in getting high officials to address his concerns.
Chen said an official from a central government bureau that handles citizens complaints has visited him in his Beijing hospital four times, including to take a statement on Thursday.
“After he took my statement, he said they would launch an investigation as long as there are facts, and that if there are facts about the illegal actions, then the issue definitely would be openly addressed,” Chen said in an interview.
Chen said it remained to be seen how seriously Beijing would probe abuses by township and county officials, which date back to 2005 after Chen angered local authorities by documenting forced late-term abortions and sterilizations in his rural community.
“Will the investigation be thorough? That’s hard to say, so we’ll have to keep monitoring,” Chen said.
The State Bureau of Letters and Calls, as the complaints office is known, did not respond. A man who answered the telephone at the duty office of the bureau refused to provide a contact number for officials who handle media requests.
However, even a preliminary investigation shows the extraordinary amount of attention Chen’s case is getting. An estimated hundreds of thousands of ordinary Chinese present petitions every year and only a fraction bring action.
Chen served four years in prison on what supporters said were fabricated charges and was then kept under house arrest with his wife, daughter and mother. Chen has described how besides assaulting him, officials would also beat up his wife and mother, at one point chasing his wife on the road, pulling her from a vehicle and then hitting her. His daughter was also subject to searches and harassment.
The mistreatment has often seemed extreme and personal, exposing the impunity local officials believe they have and Beijing’s unwillingness or inability to do anything about it.
For all its power, the authoritarian government relies on local officials to enforce policies, so Beijing must be careful not to alienate them. However, with Chen’s case now an international issue, Beijing is either feeling compelled to act or it is seizing the opportunity to get rid of local officials it dislikes.
Unless a case becomes “a big issue or crisis for them, even though they may or may not like what the local authorities are doing, they don’t have a lot of reason to try to intervene,” said Dali Yang (楊大利), a political scientist and faculty director at the University of Chicago Center in Beijing. “They don’t want to be seen as undermining local authorities because the local authorities, in doing something sometimes excessively, is also doing the bidding of the central government in maintaining stability.”
In a sign that the government does not want Chen’s case to set a precedent or encourage others, Beijing has not publicized its meetings with the activist and coverage by the domestic media, nearly all of which is state-owned, has been limited to dispatches by Xinhua news agency and editorials criticizing the US.
Though Chen, his wife and two children are in the hospital under arrangements that might see them leave for the US soon, others in his family remain at risk. Chen’s nephew, Chen Kegui (陳克貴), has reportedly been detained after a clash he had with officials following the activist’s escape from house arrest.
Chen said in his talks with the visiting official that he also conveyed his wish that the guards stationed in his home and village by local authorities be removed. He also told the official he was entrusting the hospital to handle the paperwork for his travel documents, he said.
The official responded that the government would help Chen and his family with their passports, though he did not give a time frame, Chen said.
Chen and his supporters have tried to draw attention to his mistreatment for years. After Chen escaped from arrest in his rural home in Shandong Province on April 22, he stayed in hiding in Beijing for several days during which he recorded a detailed account of the abuse and his tormentors.
In the video, Chen named Zhang Jian (張健), deputy party secretary in charge of politics and law of the township that oversees Chen’s village, as well as five other officials from several different departments, as being among his persecutors.
“More than a dozen men broke into my house to beat up my wife. They pushed my wife down on the floor, covered her with a quilt, and beat and kicked her for several hours,” he said in one example.
In the video, Chen appealed to Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) to punish authorities in the city of Linyi, saying they sent 70 to 80 officials from the county police, the local branch of the Chinese Communist Party and administrative agencies to his home “to loot and beat and harm us.”
He urged the premier to act in part to make clear whether the violations were the acts of local officials or ordered by the central government.
Chen has told US embassy officials and his lawyer, Li Jinsong (李勁松), about the visits from the official. US officials have previously said that Chinese government staffers had begun talking to Chen about his mistreatment by officials in his home province, but had no further comment yesterday.
Li welcomed the government’s inquiry, but said it would take time.
“Justice is often late, but it will not be absent,” Li said.
Additional reporting by Didi Tang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with