It is amazing the difference a one-and-a-half hour plane ride can make. Taiwan and the Philippines are neighbors, and in some places resemble each other climatically and geographically. However, when one boards a plane at Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport and disembarks at Ninoy Aquino International Airport in Manila, one has crossed a massive gulf in historical legacy, economic development and government effectiveness.
Taiwan and the Philippines became colonies of Japan and the US respectively at roughly the same time, 1895 and 1898, and were both abandoned by their colonial rulers after the end of World War II. Before their colonial eras, both Taiwan and the Philippines were governed as provinces from Beijing and Mexico City/Madrid, and enjoyed relative autonomy outside the major cities.
Despite these superficial historical similarities, the two countries developed in vastly different directions. Japan’s colonial era in Taiwan was characterized by the construction of infrastructure that acted as a base upon which the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) later built Taiwan’s economy after fleeing China in 1949. The Japanese built roads, universities, hospitals, a postal service, railroads, ports and a modern economy based on a modern government. They fought the Aborigines in the mountains and crushed all rebellions against their rule, unifying Taiwan for the first time in its modern history.
The Japanese had a far different impact on the Philippines during their short but brutal occupation in World War II, leaving many painful memories and accomplishing nothing to help the country.
In the Philippines, the US first kicked out the Spanish, enlisting the help of former Philippine president Emilio Aguinaldo, a revolutionary and independence activist in the late 19th century. However, when he realized the US just wanted to take the place of the Spanish, he led his armies in a war against the US that resulted in the brutal killings of anywhere between tens of thousands and 1 million Filipinos. The population of the Philippines was devastated and the US took on a military dictatorship role, something that did not really happen in Taiwan on a similar scale until the KMT initiated the White Terror period in the late 1940s.
True development passed the Philippines by, and that can be seen today in the way the country’s economy is run. The Asian Development Bank said in 2008 that 12 percent of the Philippines’ GDP was made up of remittances by Overseas Filipino Workers (OFW), and that number has grown in the past four years, with OFW remittances surpassing US$465 million at the same time exports are slowing, contributing to a stable 4 percent GDP growth rate last year.
Taiwan, on the other, still makes the lion’s share of its earnings from exports, something the Philippines cannot match. Both countries differ in terms of infrastructure, too. In central Manila, buildings that were bombed during World War II still stand empty, while Taiwan has embarked on a mass rapid transit building spree in all its major cities.
The Philippines has much to gain from working closely with Taiwan and vice versa. Although talk of a Taiwan-Philippines free-trade agreement (FTA) has gone on for years, nothing has ever come of it, even though Taiwan has already inked something similar to an FTA with China — the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA). Manila places more emphasis on economic deals with Singapore and Seoul, but Taiwan is a lot closer geographically, and an FTA could benefit the export markets of both. Taiwan could import raw materials from the Philippines and export manufactured goods, something that is notoriously expensive there because of all the tariffs involved.
In this way, maybe Taiwan and the Philippines could help close the yawning gap that has opened between their societies.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with