Sixty-five years have passed since the 228 Massacre began, but the wounds the tragic incident and its aftermath inflicted upon Taiwanese society have never completely healed.
Begun over an altercation involving agents of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government’s Monopoly Bureau, who beat up a woman in Taipei on Feb. 27, 1947, for selling contraband cigarettes, the incident rapidly spiraled out of control and quickly pitted a resentful Taiwanese populace against their new KMT rulers, who had been mismanaging the economy.
To stamp out any challenge to his rule, then-KMT leader Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) issued an order for loyal troops in Taiwan to fire on protesting Taiwanese, killing many. The number of dead and missing cited by academics varies, but most agree that about 20,000 lost their lives while the KMT tried to put down the insurrection.
A good number of those who went missing were Japanese-educated, simply because their KMT rulers questioned their loyalty. Others fled out of fear of persecution or worse. Stories abound of remote mountain towns or valleys — such as the Shuanglianpi (雙連埤) area in Yuanshan Township (員山), Yilan County — where numerous Japanese-educated people went to hide from the KMT throughout the late 1940s and 1950s. This kind of event leaves its mark on the memory of a nation, and if it is not addressed, it will continue to be like a bloody scab that fails to heal because it is constantly picked at.
Former premier Hau Pei-tsun’s (郝柏村) recent remark questioning the generally accepted notion that about 20,000 people were killed in the massacre and insisting that only about 500 people were killed is a symptom of the problem.
Because the victims have been generally ignored over the past 65 years and since the KMT has never fully come clean about its role in the massacre — failing to release all the documents it has on those who died and refusing to make reparations to the surviving families or give back assets it stole during and after the massacre — people like Hau can still trample on the bones of the dead, while insulting their living descendants.
Another symptom of the failure to properly bury this skeleton in the nation’s closet can be seen in an image that continues to haunt its victims. Chiang is regarded by many as the main culprit behind the massacre, yet his image still adorns the NT$5 and NT$10 coins that Taiwanese use on a daily basis.
Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Pasuya Yao (姚文智) has suggested minting new coins with images of people who contributed positively to society, such as internationally renowned painter Chen Cheng-po (陳澄波), who also fell victim to the massacre.
The ghosts of 228 continue to haunt the present because they have not been put to rest by addressing the problem honestly, adequately and with integrity. They can be seen in any political dispute between the pan-green and pan-blue camps, often manifesting themselves in so-called ethnic arguments that won’t die as long as these ghosts remain.
Sixty-five years on, it is time to put the 228 Massacre to rest so that old Taiwanese and new Taiwanese can finally reconcile.
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly widespread in workplaces, some people stand to benefit from the technology while others face lower wages and fewer job opportunities. However, from a longer-term perspective, as AI is applied more extensively to business operations, the personnel issue is not just about changes in job opportunities, but also about a structural mismatch between skills and demand. This is precisely the most pressing issue in the current labor market. Tai Wei-chun (戴偉峻), director-general of the Institute of Artificial Intelligence Innovation at the Institute for Information Industry, said in a recent interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times