Sixty-five years have passed since the 228 Massacre began, but the wounds the tragic incident and its aftermath inflicted upon Taiwanese society have never completely healed.
Begun over an altercation involving agents of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government’s Monopoly Bureau, who beat up a woman in Taipei on Feb. 27, 1947, for selling contraband cigarettes, the incident rapidly spiraled out of control and quickly pitted a resentful Taiwanese populace against their new KMT rulers, who had been mismanaging the economy.
To stamp out any challenge to his rule, then-KMT leader Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) issued an order for loyal troops in Taiwan to fire on protesting Taiwanese, killing many. The number of dead and missing cited by academics varies, but most agree that about 20,000 lost their lives while the KMT tried to put down the insurrection.
A good number of those who went missing were Japanese-educated, simply because their KMT rulers questioned their loyalty. Others fled out of fear of persecution or worse. Stories abound of remote mountain towns or valleys — such as the Shuanglianpi (雙連埤) area in Yuanshan Township (員山), Yilan County — where numerous Japanese-educated people went to hide from the KMT throughout the late 1940s and 1950s. This kind of event leaves its mark on the memory of a nation, and if it is not addressed, it will continue to be like a bloody scab that fails to heal because it is constantly picked at.
Former premier Hau Pei-tsun’s (郝柏村) recent remark questioning the generally accepted notion that about 20,000 people were killed in the massacre and insisting that only about 500 people were killed is a symptom of the problem.
Because the victims have been generally ignored over the past 65 years and since the KMT has never fully come clean about its role in the massacre — failing to release all the documents it has on those who died and refusing to make reparations to the surviving families or give back assets it stole during and after the massacre — people like Hau can still trample on the bones of the dead, while insulting their living descendants.
Another symptom of the failure to properly bury this skeleton in the nation’s closet can be seen in an image that continues to haunt its victims. Chiang is regarded by many as the main culprit behind the massacre, yet his image still adorns the NT$5 and NT$10 coins that Taiwanese use on a daily basis.
Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Pasuya Yao (姚文智) has suggested minting new coins with images of people who contributed positively to society, such as internationally renowned painter Chen Cheng-po (陳澄波), who also fell victim to the massacre.
The ghosts of 228 continue to haunt the present because they have not been put to rest by addressing the problem honestly, adequately and with integrity. They can be seen in any political dispute between the pan-green and pan-blue camps, often manifesting themselves in so-called ethnic arguments that won’t die as long as these ghosts remain.
Sixty-five years on, it is time to put the 228 Massacre to rest so that old Taiwanese and new Taiwanese can finally reconcile.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry