As the world’s major central banks hurriedly announced measures to ease stresses in global funding markets, China might have felt compelled to move to relax policy that it could otherwise have delayed for a few weeks.
China’s announcement on Wednesday that it was reducing the amount of cash that banks must hold as reserves left no doubt that the world’s second--biggest economy was doing exactly as it did in October 2008: joining a global effort by policymakers to stabilize a rattled financial system.
That somewhat surprise move achieved a lot. For Beijing, it was an opportunity to show how big a part of global policymaking China is and the stake it has in the stability of world markets. It helped that China needed to prop up its own economy.
However, it has also meant that the timetable for China’s hitherto subtle and selective policy easing has been pushed out into the open, and sped up.
“The timing of the cut is earlier than I expected,” independent Shanghai-based economist Andy Xie (謝國忠) said. “The global coordinated action to ease dollar liquidity by six central banks is probably the trigger for China’s move.”
China would have cut the reserve requirement ratio for banks eventually. The economy has slowed, inflation has eased and, most worryingly, capital outflows have accelerated.
A Reuters poll earlier this week had forecast the first cut in China’s bank reserves would come this month and the consensus was for the ratio to be trimmed 200 basis points from the peak 21.5 percent through next year. Wednesday’s 50 basis points cut has altered those expectations quite significantly.
Hong Kong-based Daiwa Capital Markets senior economist Kevin Lai (賴志文) said he now expected a further 200 basis points in reserves cuts over next year, more to prevent the economy from crash landing than to drive another boom.
Economists at HSBC expect 150 basis points of further cuts to be packed into the first half of next year.
To some extent, the policy easing has acquired an urgency because of the worrying pace at which global funding markets are drying up and as banks caught up in the eurozone debt crisis scramble to sell assets and cut their loans.
Money markets are getting as tight as they were in the weeks after Lehman Brothers collapsed in 2008. For China, the risk of more capital outflows could cause further stress in already tight credit markets.
The US Federal Reserve and other central banks, including China’s, cut policy rates simultaneously in October 2008.
This time, it is a synchronized supply of cash. Central banks in Europe, Japan and elsewhere extended agreements with the Fed giving them access to even cheaper US dollars.
China released cash from bank reserves and Brazil cut policy rates.
“It’s clear we are all in it,” Hong Kong-based HSBC economist Frederic Neumann said. “China, as everybody else, has a stake in the stability of the global financial system and China’s contribution is primarily through strong growth domestically.”
However, the concerns over a rare but steady drain of foreign money from the economy appear to have been the primary reason for the cut in the banks’ reserve requirement ratio, the first such move in nearly three years.
Preliminary data suggest capital flowed out of China in October for the first time since 2008. China had to cut bank reserves if it wanted to keep money supply stable, given that bank deposits were falling and the trade surplus was shrinking.
Freeing up the money banks can lend, rather than cutting benchmark interest rates, also makes sense when inflation is still quite high at 5.5 percent, and China’s policymakers are determined to deflate a property bubble.
“Obviously, they were thinking about it [cutting the reserve requirement ratio], and they have the hot money outflows, so it was a perfect timing for them,” ING chief Asia economist Tim Condon said.
Weak demand from China’s huge developed world trading partners has sapped exports, but the economy is growing at more than 9 percent and domestic investment is healthy.
Neither do private economists expect the central bank to embrace other forms of aggressive easing, such as by setting a higher money supply or lending target for next year.
Annual inflation eased to 5.5 percent in October from a three-year high in July, but the real returns on bank deposits remain negative considering the one-year benchmark deposit rate was only 3.5 percent.
Any cut in interest rates could exacerbate the flight of savings into higher-yielding wealth management products or even the fledgling underground lending markets that the government is seeking to control.
“It’s the start of a relaxation cycle, and the central bank is expected to take more steps — the economic slowdown is there, and capital inflows are set to fall further, and many banks are finding liquidity shortages,” Beijing-based Huachuang Securities analyst Hua Zhongwei said. “However, I still don’t think China will cut benchmark interest rates in the coming months because that would mark a fundamental change, rather than a fine-tuning.”
The central bank raised the reserve requirement for banks 12 times between January last year and June, taking the ratio to a record 21.5 percent for big banks and 19.5 percent for smaller ones.
The first step in what could be a series of cuts comes just before the Central Economic Work Conference, at which China’s leaders chart the course for economic policies next year. There again, they are expected to reiterate a policy of keeping monetary policy “prudent,” but fine-tuning it when needed.
However, because the central bank has been injecting liquidity into the banking system and selectively releasing loans to cash-starved small firms, it could be less willing to cut reserves repeatedly.
The central bank has injected 159 billion yuan (US$25 billion) into the banking system in the past five weeks via its open market operations. It also allowed yields on bills it auctions to fall steadily through last month.
In addition, the Chinese Ministry of Finance was likely to shift at least 1 trillion yuan of its surplus funds to commercial banks last month and this month, providing a boost to their deposits.
However, as Wednesday’s announcement showed, China could be compelled to ease policy if financial markets threaten to descend into chaos at the turn of the year, or if its banking system freezes before the Chinese New Year break next month.
“Once central banks move, it is never a one-off. So we certainly expect more from China,” Neumann said.
Additional reporting by Aileen Wang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with