Humanity sinking further
What has our world come to?
In response to the admirable, although long overdue, banning of shark fin soup from the menus of the Peninsula Hotels group, a public relations officer at the Grand Formosa Regent Taipei, when asked why their hotel did not also ban shark fin soup, responded: “Our job is to meet the requirements of our clients” (“Hotels refuse to drop shark fin soup,” Nov. 27, page 1).
Translate that into: “Our job is to make money, no matter what. If clients wanted boiled children’s head soup, and it was legal, we would serve that, too. We have a complete absence of any moral values, because making money tops every other consideration in the world.”
In this, our corporate-sponsored world, greed now infests almost every aspect of economic and political action and it filters down to ordinary customers who don’t seem to mind gobbling down the last few remaining members of a species that has been living on this planet for much longer than we have, or to fight our fellow human beings tooth-and-nail over discounted bath towels (“Mass violence and pepper spray mar US’ ‘Black Friday,’” Nov. 27, page 1).
I am completely at a loss as to why humanity has sunken so low.
Is our only idea of progress the ever-increasing consumption of the Earth’s natural resources? What about enjoying and protecting beautiful things, such as landscapes and the plants and animals that live in them, or old, historic buildings, which seem to disappear even faster than sharks? What about spending time with family and friends instead of wasting our time in traffic jams and lineups just to get the newest iPhone?
And why do we even care about buying “things we don’t need with money we don’t have to impress people we don’t like,” to freely quote author Dave Ramsey (www.goodreads.com/quotes/show/25775)?
I am more and more convinced that real progress, which means making a better living for ourselves and all the other living creatures on this planet, actually stopped decades ago. What we see around us now is negative progress, because despite people having more money in their pockets, they behave worse, their societies are built around despicable greed and mindless consumption, and our Earth is getting more and more polluted and destroyed.
Unless we radically change our moral values and take care of each other and our fellow beings and spend our money on worthwhile things, I do not have much hope for humanity.
Flora Faun
Taipei
Chinese agents often target Taiwanese officials who are motivated by financial gain rather than ideology, while people who are found guilty of spying face lenient punishments in Taiwan, a researcher said on Tuesday. While the law says that foreign agents can be sentenced to death, people who are convicted of spying for Beijing often serve less than nine months in prison because Taiwan does not formally recognize China as a foreign nation, Institute for National Defense and Security Research fellow Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲) said. Many officials and military personnel sell information to China believing it to be of little value, unaware that
Before 1945, the most widely spoken language in Taiwan was Tai-gi (also known as Taiwanese, Taiwanese Hokkien or Hoklo). However, due to almost a century of language repression policies, many Taiwanese believe that Tai-gi is at risk of disappearing. To understand this crisis, I interviewed academics and activists about Taiwan’s history of language repression, the major challenges of revitalizing Tai-gi and their policy recommendations. Although Taiwanese were pressured to speak Japanese when Taiwan became a Japanese colony in 1895, most managed to keep their heritage languages alive in their homes. However, starting in 1949, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) enacted martial law
“Si ambulat loquitur tetrissitatque sicut anas, anas est” is, in customary international law, the three-part test of anatine ambulation, articulation and tetrissitation. And it is essential to Taiwan’s existence. Apocryphally, it can be traced as far back as Suetonius (蘇埃托尼烏斯) in late first-century Rome. Alas, Suetonius was only talking about ducks (anas). But this self-evident principle was codified as a four-part test at the Montevideo Convention in 1934, to which the United States is a party. Article One: “The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: a) a permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) government;
The central bank and the US Department of the Treasury on Friday issued a joint statement that both sides agreed to avoid currency manipulation and the use of exchange rates to gain a competitive advantage, and would only intervene in foreign-exchange markets to combat excess volatility and disorderly movements. The central bank also agreed to disclose its foreign-exchange intervention amounts quarterly rather than every six months, starting from next month. It emphasized that the joint statement is unrelated to tariff negotiations between Taipei and Washington, and that the US never requested the appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar during the
RSS