Private eyes
A recent editorial (“Meaningless without enforcement,” Nov. 24, page 8) was spot-on and I agree that creating a bunch of regulations that police officers can’t meaningfully enforce is a waste of time. However, the solution is really just a few mouse clicks away.
Inspired by your fantastic article (“Taipei trash informants earn more than NT$1 million,” Sept. 16, page 2) which reported on two men who took videos of people violating the Waste Disposal Act (廢棄物清理法) and mailing DVDs of the footage to Taipei City’s Bureau of Environmental Protection to collect cash rewards, I propose the following solution:
Set up a government Web site where activists such as myself can create an account and upload videos of polluters, YouTube-style. These could be grouped under different headings, such as smoky scooters, drivers who idle for more than three minutes, red-light runners, riders without helmets, license plates with an expired inspection sticker and every other issue that activists are trying to stamp out. Note that these are all offenses for which a person can be fined and that frequently go unpunished.
I believe the trash informants’ project should be institutionalized so that more people abide by the letter of the law, activists and interested parties have a better way to participate, and income opportunities could be created for the disadvantaged. Heck, with all the smoky scooters in Taipei, even the guy selling The Big Issue on the street corner could make a killing doing this.
While riding my bicycle, I regularly use my camera to videotape smoky scooters and people who idle for longer than the recently mandated three minute limit while talking on their cellphones. With such a Web site, I could log in, enter the license plate number of the offending vehicle, date, time and location of the incident, and upload the video showing the violation. Officials at government bureaus responsible for enforcing these rules would subsequently approve each submission and assess an appropriate fine.
This would all be set up in an open and transparent manner, with members of the public able to enter their license plate number to see if anyone has reported them breaking any traffic rules. Inspectors could then run checks on each plate as they do an annual inspection to “dig up dirt” on each vehicle and encourage the owner to pay outstanding fines under threat of having their vehicle impounded. Once the fines are paid, the videos and data would be removed from the site.
Some might say: “What about my privacy?” and I would reply: “STFU. You are operating a potentially deadly vehicle on a public road that my taxes help pay for.” Taiwan is either a country that follows the rule of law, or it’s not. Helmets are the law, and a red light means stop. Violators should be prosecuted.”
Readers might think that my position on this issue is extreme, but I am tired of dodging red-light-running cars and scooters every day, whether cycling or walking. For drivers of smoky scooters, if you honestly can’t afford to get a new spark plug and an oil change, contact my organization, Idle-Free Taipei, and we’ll scrape together the NT$350 or so to help you out.
Torch Pratt
Yonghe
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
After 37 US lawmakers wrote to express concern over legislators’ stalling of critical budgets, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) pledged to make the Executive Yuan’s proposed NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.7 billion) special defense budget a top priority for legislative review. On Tuesday, it was finally listed on the legislator’s plenary agenda for Friday next week. The special defense budget was proposed by President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration in November last year to enhance the nation’s defense capabilities against external threats from China. However, the legislature, dominated by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), repeatedly blocked its review. The
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) said on Monday that it would be announcing its mayoral nominees for New Taipei City, Yilan County and Chiayi City on March 11, after which it would begin talks with the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) to field joint opposition candidates. The KMT would likely support Deputy Taipei Mayor Lee Shu-chuan (李四川) as its candidate for New Taipei City. The TPP is fielding its chairman, Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), for New Taipei City mayor, after Huang had officially announced his candidacy in December last year. Speaking in a radio program, Huang was asked whether he would join Lee’s
RSS