Both the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) have established “academies” to groom up-and-coming politicians and school them in the mores and operations of their respective parties. May we suggest that both add some intensive history courses?
For the KMT a course in Taiwan’s history from 1895 to 2000 and one in modern world history from World War I to present day would do; for the DPP, just the modern history should suffice. Judging from this past week’s events, they are sorely needed, and this month must have set a new record for an outbreak of foot-in-mouth disease.
There was President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wondering if he needed to apologize for “the sin” of being a Mainlander. Once again playing the old downtrodden, misunderstood Mainlander card, just like he did when he basically whitewashed Taipei’s 228 Memorial Museum when he was mayor, terminating the museum management contract with the Taiwan Peace Foundation to ensure that exhibitions were “more balanced” because Mainlanders had suffered too. Of course, he excelled at playing the “ethnic” card in the 2008 presidential election, largely by complaining about the pan-green camp doing the same thing.
Then there was the whole kerfuffle over who out-Hakkas who, led by former KMT chairman Wu Poh-hsiung’s (吳伯雄) stupid attack on DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) inability to speak her “native” tongue. Wu appeared either ignorant of or oblivious to the role his party had played in trying to eradicate any language but Mandarin. It is hard to believe it was either, so his verbal outburst must have simply been a case of political stupidity.
However, other Hakka leaders did not win any points by calling the KMT’s language-suppression efforts “Nazi-like” and the equivalent of “linguistic genocide.” There have been many cases throughout history and around the world of one culture trying to suppress the culture and/or language of another sharing the same territory.
The English did it in Ireland for centuries, and when a national school system was introduced in 1831, children who spoke Irish in school would be beaten with a stick. And like in Taiwan, many Irish parents pushed their children to learn English to better their chances of getting ahead, even if it meant losing their native tongue. Turkey continues to do it today with the Kurdish language and the Basques in Spain have battled Madrid’s heavy-handed policies for decades.
So there are many examples one could draw upon without resorting to Adolf Hitler and his National Socialists before and during World War II, especially given the misuse of Hitler’s image in commercial and political advertising in Taiwan in recent years.
As a media organization, it has gotten downright painful to have to report on the historical fallacies reiterated ad nauseam by politicians of all camps. Society should be offended that men and women, many of whom were educated to the master’s or doctoral level by taxpayer money — either at home or abroad — continue to utter such inanities.
With all this going on, a small story about Taipei may have been overlooked this week. The capital’s “total recycling, zero landfill” program won second place in this year’s Metropolis Awards, which are handed out for projects that improve the quality of urban life. Taipei residents should be proud of how well they have done in reducing the amount of garbage they produce — a program that was first launched, by the way, when former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was mayor, though Ma and Taipei’s current mayor, Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), like to claim most of the credit for themselves and the KMT.
Why bring this up? Because if the politicians residing or working in Taipei could only limit the amount of verbal and written garbage they produce, the quality of life for the entire nation would vastly improve.
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
Saturday is the day of the first batch of recall votes primarily targeting lawmakers of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). The scale of the recall drive far outstrips the expectations from when the idea was mooted in January by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘). The mass recall effort is reminiscent of the Sunflower movement protests against the then-KMT government’s non-transparent attempts to push through a controversial cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014. That movement, initiated by students, civic groups and non-governmental organizations, included student-led protesters occupying the main legislative chamber for three weeks. The two movements are linked
RSS