Both the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) have established “academies” to groom up-and-coming politicians and school them in the mores and operations of their respective parties. May we suggest that both add some intensive history courses?
For the KMT a course in Taiwan’s history from 1895 to 2000 and one in modern world history from World War I to present day would do; for the DPP, just the modern history should suffice. Judging from this past week’s events, they are sorely needed, and this month must have set a new record for an outbreak of foot-in-mouth disease.
There was President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wondering if he needed to apologize for “the sin” of being a Mainlander. Once again playing the old downtrodden, misunderstood Mainlander card, just like he did when he basically whitewashed Taipei’s 228 Memorial Museum when he was mayor, terminating the museum management contract with the Taiwan Peace Foundation to ensure that exhibitions were “more balanced” because Mainlanders had suffered too. Of course, he excelled at playing the “ethnic” card in the 2008 presidential election, largely by complaining about the pan-green camp doing the same thing.
Then there was the whole kerfuffle over who out-Hakkas who, led by former KMT chairman Wu Poh-hsiung’s (吳伯雄) stupid attack on DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) inability to speak her “native” tongue. Wu appeared either ignorant of or oblivious to the role his party had played in trying to eradicate any language but Mandarin. It is hard to believe it was either, so his verbal outburst must have simply been a case of political stupidity.
However, other Hakka leaders did not win any points by calling the KMT’s language-suppression efforts “Nazi-like” and the equivalent of “linguistic genocide.” There have been many cases throughout history and around the world of one culture trying to suppress the culture and/or language of another sharing the same territory.
The English did it in Ireland for centuries, and when a national school system was introduced in 1831, children who spoke Irish in school would be beaten with a stick. And like in Taiwan, many Irish parents pushed their children to learn English to better their chances of getting ahead, even if it meant losing their native tongue. Turkey continues to do it today with the Kurdish language and the Basques in Spain have battled Madrid’s heavy-handed policies for decades.
So there are many examples one could draw upon without resorting to Adolf Hitler and his National Socialists before and during World War II, especially given the misuse of Hitler’s image in commercial and political advertising in Taiwan in recent years.
As a media organization, it has gotten downright painful to have to report on the historical fallacies reiterated ad nauseam by politicians of all camps. Society should be offended that men and women, many of whom were educated to the master’s or doctoral level by taxpayer money — either at home or abroad — continue to utter such inanities.
With all this going on, a small story about Taipei may have been overlooked this week. The capital’s “total recycling, zero landfill” program won second place in this year’s Metropolis Awards, which are handed out for projects that improve the quality of urban life. Taipei residents should be proud of how well they have done in reducing the amount of garbage they produce — a program that was first launched, by the way, when former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was mayor, though Ma and Taipei’s current mayor, Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), like to claim most of the credit for themselves and the KMT.
Why bring this up? Because if the politicians residing or working in Taipei could only limit the amount of verbal and written garbage they produce, the quality of life for the entire nation would vastly improve.
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國樑) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Tuesday last week apologized over allegations that the former director of the city’s Civil Affairs Department had illegally accessed citizens’ data to assist the KMT in its campaign to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) councilors. Given the public discontent with opposition lawmakers’ disruptive behavior in the legislature, passage of unconstitutional legislation and slashing of the central government’s budget, civic groups have launched a massive campaign to recall KMT lawmakers. The KMT has tried to fight back by initiating campaigns to recall DPP lawmakers, but the petition documents they
RSS