Both the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) have established “academies” to groom up-and-coming politicians and school them in the mores and operations of their respective parties. May we suggest that both add some intensive history courses?
For the KMT a course in Taiwan’s history from 1895 to 2000 and one in modern world history from World War I to present day would do; for the DPP, just the modern history should suffice. Judging from this past week’s events, they are sorely needed, and this month must have set a new record for an outbreak of foot-in-mouth disease.
There was President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wondering if he needed to apologize for “the sin” of being a Mainlander. Once again playing the old downtrodden, misunderstood Mainlander card, just like he did when he basically whitewashed Taipei’s 228 Memorial Museum when he was mayor, terminating the museum management contract with the Taiwan Peace Foundation to ensure that exhibitions were “more balanced” because Mainlanders had suffered too. Of course, he excelled at playing the “ethnic” card in the 2008 presidential election, largely by complaining about the pan-green camp doing the same thing.
Then there was the whole kerfuffle over who out-Hakkas who, led by former KMT chairman Wu Poh-hsiung’s (吳伯雄) stupid attack on DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) inability to speak her “native” tongue. Wu appeared either ignorant of or oblivious to the role his party had played in trying to eradicate any language but Mandarin. It is hard to believe it was either, so his verbal outburst must have simply been a case of political stupidity.
However, other Hakka leaders did not win any points by calling the KMT’s language-suppression efforts “Nazi-like” and the equivalent of “linguistic genocide.” There have been many cases throughout history and around the world of one culture trying to suppress the culture and/or language of another sharing the same territory.
The English did it in Ireland for centuries, and when a national school system was introduced in 1831, children who spoke Irish in school would be beaten with a stick. And like in Taiwan, many Irish parents pushed their children to learn English to better their chances of getting ahead, even if it meant losing their native tongue. Turkey continues to do it today with the Kurdish language and the Basques in Spain have battled Madrid’s heavy-handed policies for decades.
So there are many examples one could draw upon without resorting to Adolf Hitler and his National Socialists before and during World War II, especially given the misuse of Hitler’s image in commercial and political advertising in Taiwan in recent years.
As a media organization, it has gotten downright painful to have to report on the historical fallacies reiterated ad nauseam by politicians of all camps. Society should be offended that men and women, many of whom were educated to the master’s or doctoral level by taxpayer money — either at home or abroad — continue to utter such inanities.
With all this going on, a small story about Taipei may have been overlooked this week. The capital’s “total recycling, zero landfill” program won second place in this year’s Metropolis Awards, which are handed out for projects that improve the quality of urban life. Taipei residents should be proud of how well they have done in reducing the amount of garbage they produce — a program that was first launched, by the way, when former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was mayor, though Ma and Taipei’s current mayor, Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), like to claim most of the credit for themselves and the KMT.
Why bring this up? Because if the politicians residing or working in Taipei could only limit the amount of verbal and written garbage they produce, the quality of life for the entire nation would vastly improve.
The White House’s decision to take a 9.9 percent stake in Intel Corp is looking like very shrewd business indeed. Since the government bought in at US$20.47 a share last August, the US chipmaker’s surging stock price has delivered the US a US$43 billion return. One of the reasons the investment has so far proved so sound is that the White House has made sure of it. According to The Wall Street Journal, Howard personally pushed deals on Intel’s behalf with some of the most lucrative clients imaginable. They include Nvidia Corp, the company at the heart of the AI
A single photograph can cut through a lot of noise, but it can also be used to misrepresent the truth. At the very least, it can concentrate the mind on something that requires further investigation. On Monday last week, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation CEO Tai Hsia-ling (戴遐齡) and former National Security Council secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) held a news conference in which they showed a photograph of former foundation CEO Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑), now Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) deputy chairman. In the image Hsiao is seated next to Xiamen Taiwan Businessmen Association chairman Han Ying-huan (韓螢煥). The two men were holding
I first met Professor Ray Jiing (井迎瑞) as a film and documentary student at Shih Hsin University’s (SHU) Department of Radio Television and Film in 1988. The following year, he went on to become the director of the Chinese Taipei Film Archive — forerunner of the Taiwan Film and Audiovisual Institute (TFAI). Over his eight-year tenure, Jiing rescued and restored over 200 classic Taiwanese films. In 1997, he established the Graduate Institute of Studies in Documentary and Film Archiving at Tainan National University of the Arts (TNNUA), and I joined the program in his third cohort of students. Beyond a
President William Lai Ching-te’s (賴清德) May 20 second-anniversary address was not just a routine policy review; it was damage control. US President Donald Trump’s remarks — that he did not want to see anyone move toward independence and that the delivery of a major Taiwan arms package could depend on the progress of US-China relations — unsettled Taiwan’s public and created an opening for opposition parties to question whether Taiwan was being treated as a bargaining chip in Washington’s dealings with Beijing. Lai’s speech was designed to close that opening. The address covered the expected ground: sovereignty, cross-strait relations, defense spending,