In August, the European balance-of-payments crisis moved beyond the eurozone’s periphery and began buffeting Italy. Interest spreads for Italian government bonds began to rise and Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi’s administration was alarmed enough to implement an austerity program, while the European Central Bank (ECB) helped with extra liquidity.
The ECB directed the central banks of all eurozone members to buy huge quantities of Italian government bonds during the crisis. While the national central banks have not revealed how much they bought, the aggregate stock of all government bonds purchased rose from 74 billion euros (US$102 billion) on Aug. 4 to 165 billion euros this month. Most of this increase was probably used to purchase Italian government bonds.
opposed
The German Bundesbank, which was forced to buy most of the bonds, strongly opposed the program, but was unable to stop it. In response, ECB Chief Economist Juergen Stark resigned. He followed former Bundesbank president Axel Weber, who had resigned in February because of the earlier bond repurchases. Meanwhile, new Bundesbank President Jens Weidmann openly objects to the program, while German President Christian Wulff has publicly accused the ECB of circumventing the Maastricht Treaty.
However, the bond purchases are just the tip of the iceberg. Equally important, but largely unknown, is the fact that the Banca d’Italia has resorted to the printing press to cover Italy’s gigantic balance of payments deficit. The extra money printing and lending, as measured by the so-called Target deficit, effectively means drawing a credit from the ECB.
This credit replaces the private capital imports that had hitherto financed the country’s net purchases of foreign goods, but which dried up because of the crisis and it finances a capital flight, ie, the purchase of foreign assets.
The ECB in turn draws the Target credit from the respective national central banks to which the money is flowing and which therefore has to accept a reduction in its scope for issuing refinancing credit.
Until July, only Greece, Ireland, Portugal and Spain had drawn Target credit, for a combined total of 330 billion euros. Italy was stable and did not seem to need the printing press to solve its financial problems. No longer.
highest target loan
In August alone, Italy’s central bank drew 40 billion euros in Target credit and it probably drew roughly another 50 billion euros last month, when the Bundesbank’s Target loans to the ECB system increased by 59 billion euros (after a 47 billion euros increase in August). This is the highest Target loan ever drawn from the Bundesbank in a single month and in all likelihood it went primarily to Italy.
This is an explosion in slow motion. The stock of overall Target credit that the ECB system has drawn from the Bundesbank was about zero until mid-2007. By the end of last month, it had climbed to 450 billion euros — in addition to the purchases of government bonds that the Bundesbank has been forced to make.
As Italy’s monthly current account deficit approximates only 3 billion to 4 billion euros, the Target credit must have compensated primarily for capital flight. Italian investors sold their assets to the banking system, which paid with newly printed money. The investors then invested the proceeds in Germany, buying shares, bonds and other assets. In essence, Germany and Italy traded Target claims against marketable assets.
Greece, Ireland, Portugal and Spain’s collective draw on Target credits forced the Bundesbank to reduce the refinancing credit that it issued by about 30 billion euros per year from 2008 to the end of last year, when it stood at barely 90 billion euros. At that rate, it was predicted that the level could fall to zero within the next three years.
negative
However, the Italian Target credit has now exceeded that estimate. Last month, the Bundesbank’s stock of refinancing loans, net of its deposit facilities vis-a-vis German banks, turned negative for the first time in history. The ECB’s shifting of refinancing credit via the Target system has therefore already hit the limit, three years earlier than the trend of the past three years would have suggested.
This is not the end of the world, not even for the ECB, but the Bundesbank has entered a new regime in which it will have to borrow extensively from the private banking sector to absorb the flight money from the crisis countries. They, in turn, will continue to compensate for capital flight by cranking up the money-printing press.
With this, the eurozone has entered dangerous territory. Deposit facilities count as central bank money and have inflationary potential, given that the German banks could withdraw those funds at any time. If they do, more than the Target balances could be exploding in Europe.
Hans-Werner Sinn is a professor of economics and public finance at the University of Munich in Germany and president of the Ifo Institute.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with