President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) government recently used several billion New Taiwan dollars worth of taxpayers’ hard-earned money to celebrate what it calls the 100th anniversary of the “Republic of China” (ROC).
However, based on what I have seen and experienced over more than six decades, the essence of and truth about the “ROC” can be demonstrated through the following three points:
First, the ROC is a foreign entity.
After World War II, dictator Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who lost the Chinese Civil War against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), brought millions of soldiers and civilians from China with him to Taiwan and set up his “ROC shop” here.
After experiencing the 228 Incident of 1947, people in Taiwan were afraid and did not dare stop them, but gave them a “cold welcome” as some overseas encyclopedias have described the way Taiwanese reacted to the arrival of Chiang and his troops.
Despite Taiwan’s democratization, Ma, after restoring the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) to power, has forced the “one China” principle of the so-called “1992 consensus” that was purportedly secretly formulated between the KMT and China onto Taiwan.
This is clear evidence that the “foreign” nature of the ROC has never changed.
Second, the “ROC” belongs to the KMT.
More than 60 years after losing the Chinese Civil War and coming to Taiwan, the national flag still has the Chinese Nationalist Party’s emblem on it and what is supposed to be the “national anthem” still has lines about “the foundation of our party.”
The “ROC” is clearly still part of the Chinese KMT’s party-state system rather than a state that belongs to everyone, across party lines.
What’s more, after Taiwan’s democratization, the KMT still has huge amounts of ill-gotten party assets that came from their direct access to the national treasury.
This has enabled the party to corrupt the hearts and minds of the public by continuing to control the media, and through its local vote captains, vote buying.
Third, the ROC has disappeared from the international community: UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of Oct. 25, 1971, expelled Chiang’s representatives from the UN and gave China’s seat to the People’s Republic of China.
After Ma became president, he implemented his “diplomatic truce,” which also included giving up on the idea of UN membership for Taiwan, thus continuing to eliminate the presence of the ROC in the international arena.
It is no wonder then that when China’s Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) came to Taiwan — there was a lot of effort made to hide the ROC flag, that symbol of the party-state — Chen addressed Ma as “you” instead of using the title “president.”
On that occasion, despite being on Taiwanese soil, Ma showed a total lack of courage by refusing to even talk about the existence of the ROC.
As the KMT celebrates the 100th anniversary of “its” party-state, we Taiwanese have to wake up and realize that joining hands to rectify the name of our country, drawing up a new Constitution and taking part in a citizens’ movement aimed at gaining Taiwan’s acceptance into the UN are the only ways in which Taiwan can become a nation defined by common goals and thereby ensure its survival.
William J.K. Lo is president of the Taiwan United Nations Alliance.
Translated by Drew Cameron
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng (何立峰) are expected to meet this month in Paris to prepare for a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). According to media reports, the two sides would discuss issues such as the potential purchase of Boeing aircraft by China, increasing imports of US soybeans and the latest impacts of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. However, recent US military action against Iran has added uncertainty to the Trump-Xi summit. Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) called the joint US-Israeli airstrikes and the
RSS