China has grown fabulously wealthy over the past 30 years, and especially the past decade. In the same period, the West has gone through a seemingly constant cycle of boom and bust, followed by the deep “recession” that set in a couple of years ago and shows no sign of ending any time soon.
How did China grow so wealthy while the West was hollowed out? The simple answer is by manufacturing all the junk the West can’t live without, at a cheaper price than anybody else. To buy China’s junk, which is now increasingly supplemented by high-quality, high-technology products, Western countries had to buy the Chinese yuan with their own currencies to facilitate international trade. Because China’s currency is not freely convertible, most of that foreign currency — the lion’s share of which, coming from the world’s biggest consumer, was US dollars — wound up in China, where officials had to decide what to do with the mountains of cash they were accumulating.
After the collapse of the Soviet Union — and just before the US decided it was going to be the world’s only superpower — one Chinese official must have had a bright idea: “Aiya! We can buy US bonds [debt].”
China then bankrolled the largest growth spurt in US history, while the US dug itself into the deepest hole any would-be empire has ever gotten itself into. About 20 years later, and after a decade of war, the creditor is coming back to bite the US in the rear.
China now has unprecedented political “influence” over the US. It is not complete, of course, but when you see US officials kowtowing every time Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) shows up — US President Barack Obama bowed pretty deeply to Hu when he visited Washington — and begging China to not drop US bonds — something US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton did after Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) questioned the safety of the US dollar — it gives you an idea of just how far the US is willing to bend over for China.
Like Bobby Fischer, China played an exquisite game of chess — and the US lost, even though China was by far the weaker of the two just three decades ago.
This strategy worked so successfully with the US that China is now looking to do the same thing with Europe. At least, that was the message Wen was sending on Wednesday when he told the World Economic Forum that China would ramp up investments in Europe despite the recent flight of capital from the eurozone by investors who are increasingly pessimistic about the future.
China looks set to buy Europe on the cheap. First Greece, Portugal and Spain; then Italy, and who knows who will be next.
Chinese officials did not help the US out of the kindness of their hearts, and their interest in the eurozone is anything but philanthropic. Beijing has already hinted that it would very much like the EU to give China “full market-economy status” in the near future, despite most of China’s largest companies being state-run, if it is to pour money into Europe and thus save the euro — quid pro quo.
That makes it two for China and zero for the rest of the world.
A few more years of this, and we should not be surprised to see China as the newest member of the EU — which would probably be a lot better for the rest of Europe than inviting in Croatia.
Meanwhile, the US might, as Bolivian President Evo Morales once said, find itself increasingly resembling a Chinese colony.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS