An attractive brunette in a business suit is making her online pitch. “Are you tired of searching for legit CVV shops?” her animated form asks from the corner of the Web site. “Search no more,” she promises. This site has “handpicked cards” with “high balances.” “What are you waiting for? Register now.”
It looks like a legitimate business Web site, one for small business financing perhaps. However, I’m being shown this site — and asked not to identify it — by FBI special agent Keith Mularski in the offices of the National Cyber-Forensics & Training Alliance (NCFTA), a Pittsburgh-based alliance between international law enforcement agencies, businesses and academics that has been charged with tackling the growing menace of cybercrime. This is a site at the cutting edge of crime.
CVV stands for card verification value. This site, and its equally professional rivals, are selling stolen credit card information to criminals who snap them up like songs on iTunes. A dollar buys enough information to use someone else’s card online, US$30 buys a “dump,” all the information you need to copy a card and set off on your own real-world shopping spree with somebody else’s plastic.
There are millions of stolen accounts available, hacked from banks and online sellers, or swiped at cash machines. The FBI recently reclaimed 1.5 million numbers from one seller alone. You can sort by type, MasterCard, Visa, or American Express, by geography, or just stick to business cards for their higher balances. There is no need to fear getting ripped off. Criminals peer-review each other’s sites. It’s eBay for crooks.
Mularski knows a thing or two about cybercrime. For two years he ran one of the biggest underworld crime sites in the world. Using the pseudonym Master Splynter (a nod to the cartoon Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles) Mularski masqueraded as a spammer, winning the confidence of online crooks and eventually taking over as host of Dark Market, at the time the largest online forum for cybercriminals.
The sting was a big victory for the US authorities, which, along with other governments, have struggled to keep up with the rapidly spreading threat.
Police officers from the UK, Germany, Netherlands, Australia and other countries work alongside the FBI at the NCFTA. The organization has about 500 business partners, from the big banks to technology companies and links with academics at local universities Carnegie Mellon and Pittsburgh.
The scale of the problem they are tackling is dizzying. According to a recent study by the British government, cybercrime is endemic and costs UK businesses alone an estimated £27 billion (US$44 billion) a year.
The criminals that buy this information operate a vast, international enterprise that employs teams of “mules” to buy goods either in person or online and yet more mules to launder their cash. They pay each other via digital currencies.
“Would you take a credit card if you were one of these guys?” Mularski asks.
These are multimillion-dollar businesses with serious costs.
“This is serious money,” he said.
And it is serious criminals that are doing it. Mularski says he hates the term “hacker.”
“It’s so generic,” he said. “Traditionally we have thought of this cybercriminal as a geek. When I first started in cybercrime, the impression I got was [of] the movie War Games, Matthew Broderick sitting in his parents’ basement. That’s not the case anymore. These are serious businessmen with serious skills.”
One man arrested as part of a recent FBI investigation had contracts with a factory in China to mass produce fake credit card readers that could steal people’s details. There is violence. Rivals have been kidnapped and tortured, and one spammer tried to take out a hit on a witness.
“Very traditional organized crime is moving into the cyber realm,” Mularski said.
Traditional organized crime activities such as racketeering or prostitution are not going away, but the new generation of criminals is as excited about online growth as their legitimate business rivals, he said.
However, there are major differences.
“This isn’t The Sopranos, or gangs,” he said. “You don’t have the same physical interaction. Here you do your transactions with the push of button, click of a mouse.”
Internet crime also attracts people who would never get involved in a bank robbery.
“When you are behind a keyboard, you’re anonymous, you have more bravado. You need a lot of chutzpah to go into a bank and rob it. You do things online that you may not do in ordinary life. People don’t start out thinking they will be a cybercriminal. They start out exploring. And before you know it, the line is crossed from curiosity to crime,” Mularski said.
Mularski’s high profile makes him a target for hackers. His office has also been working on tackling Anonymous, the hacker collective that has humiliated US government departments and big business on numerous occasions.
He would not comment on them except to say: “Hacking into a company, whether it’s to put information on the Web for everyone to see or if you’re going to make money, is still hacking, it’s still a crime.”
So does he feel vulnerable?
“I was worried for a bit, I’ll be honest,” he said, knocking on wood. “I’m very careful now. But the best protection of all is to turn your computer off.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with