According to an opinion poll completed on Sunday last week by the Chinese-language magazine the Journalist, with less than five months until next year’s presidential and legislative elections, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has a support rate of 45.7 percent, slightly ahead of the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) presidential candidate, Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), who has a support rate of 40.2 percent.
However, opinion polls often overestimate the support rate of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidates and underestimate that of DPP candidates. For example, in the 2008 presidential election, Ma beat former premier Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) by 17 percentage points, but before the elections, media outlets predicted Ma would defeat Hsieh by 21.5 to 30 percentage points, which shows that the opinion polls were off by 4.5 to 13 percentage points. That is to say that Ma’s lead of 5.5 percentage points over Tsai falls within the margin of error.
In terms of satisfaction with the administration of government affairs, Tsai still has a good chance of winning the presidential election. According to the poll in the Journalist magazine, only 42.5 percent of voters said they were satisfied with Ma, lower than the 44.8 percent of respondents who said they were dissatisfied with Ma. For Tsai, 43.6 percent of respondents were satisfied with her administration of policy, much higher than the 24.5 percent who said they were dissatisfied. This shows that voters have high hopes for Tsai, but also that 47.1 percent of respondents believe Ma is better suited to being president, compared with 42.5 percent preferring Tsai.
This means that approximately 3 to 5 percent of respondents who said they were dissatisfied with Ma were still willing to give him a chance to stay in power and do not have much confidence in Tsai. Therefore, Tsai must work harder at expounding and promoting her policies and visions if she wants to win the support of these key voters.
For the past month, People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) has said he might run for president, but only 31.8 percent of respondents believe he should, while 49.6 percent believe that he should not.
Of the three aforementioned presidential candidates, only 16.7 percent of respondents support Soong, which is behind Ma’s 37.2 percent and Tsai’s 31.9 percent. If Soong were only up against either Tsai or Ma, only about a third of poll respondents said they would support Soong. That means that whether in terms of legitimacy for a presidential bid, absolute support or relative support, Soong would have a hard time beating the KMT and the DPP candidates.
Even though it would be hard for Soong to take the presidential seat, he should aim to help the PFP gain more than the 5 percent of votes required for a party to enter the legislature and be allotted at-large legislative seats.
As for the legislative elections, 32.7 percent of survey respondents said they would support the DPP, 33.7 percent said they would support the KMT and 4 percent said they would support the PFP. Also, 48.8 percent said they were willing to split their vote, that is voting for a different party in the presidential and legislative elections.
If the PFP can promote itself as a party that is effective in terms of governance, that pushes for legislative reform and that promotes high-quality candidates, Soong’s electoral bid could help create momentum for the PFP, help it maintain its position as Taiwan’s third-biggest party and even help it become a force for administrative reform after the election. I believe this is why Soong is working so hard now.
Tung Chen-yuan is a professor at National Chengchi University’s Graduate Institute of Development Studies.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with