Last month’s edition of Science ran a series of demographic papers and special reports discussing current global population issues. One of these discussed the Taiwanese government’s population policies and the measures it has introduced to encourage more women to give birth.
These policies were also compared with those of other Asian countries, such as Japan, South Korea and Singapore. Last year, Taiwan’s total fertility rate (TFR) for women was under 0.9, the lowest in the world. If one were to take this TFR and convert it into the cohort fertility rate for women in Taiwan — cohort here meaning other individuals of shared circumstances within a given period of time — to estimate the fertility rate for a woman throughout her lifetime, then in the future about 20 percent of women in this country will not have children. This is a rather startling statistic and a future demographic trend that should not be taken lightly.
Demographic experts regard a TFR below the critical threshold of 1.3 as the “lowest-low fertility rate,” because in a given society, assuming no immigration or emigration, a TFR this low would cause the population to virtually halve within a single generation, defined here as 45 years. If this is the case, the nation’s economy will stagnate and the problem of caring for an aging population will become a huge challenge.
The TFR figures for women in Taiwan published by the Ministry of the Interior are actually the period total fertility rate (PTFR) for women, this being calculated from the current fertility rate for women. However, the important figure is the completed cohort fertility rate (CCFR), a measure of the number of offspring actually produced by women before they reach 50, the average age of menopause. According to the latest figures, Taiwan’s CCFR for women beyond their child-bearing age was in the 1.3 to 1.5 range, not the present figure of 0.9.
Such estimates also need to take into consideration whether or not Taiwanese women are continuing to put off having children. This is because if they continue to marry later, remain single, or decide to delay having their first child, many will fail to achieve the ideal fertility rate, or number of births, and will decide to wait until the optimum age to have children, which is about 34.
When it comes to the issue of fertility, society tends to defer to individual choice. However, the number of children born affects the future of every individual in society. If nobody wants to have children today, in 20 or 30 years’ time we will lack the necessary amount of workers paying taxes to support social welfare and medical treatment for the population.
In that context, today’s low fertility rates are clearly -something that society as a whole should be taking seriously.
Consequently, we should regard the current fertility rate and the decision by young people to not have children, as a human rights issue. Of course individuals have the right to choose whether they have children, but those individuals who do decide to have children should be universally encouraged, ensuring that they get the assistance they need.
The government needs to devise a comprehensive set of proposals for its policy on fertility to encourage young people to enter into marriage and start a family, and to make sure they can afford to raise their children. In order to develop an effective, viable policy that will secure an increase in the fertility rate, there needs to be a broad-based consensus in society.
The government’s current policy of providing incentives and allowances to encourage women to have children needs the support of the general public. Subsidies are higher in other parts of the world. In some remote areas of Russia, for example, the government provides quite substantial allowances.
However, demographic experts believe that government fertility policies may have only a limited effect in terms of increasing the fertility rate.
In about 2005, the fertility rates of many nations with low fertility rates and subsidies already in place rose to a higher level. The nature of the causal relationship between government policy and increases in the fertility rate is therefore difficult to discern. Having said that, experts also believe that if governments have no clear fertility policy in place, the situation will further deteriorate.
There may well be an increase in births in Taiwan next year, representing a small rise in the fertility rate. However, the real challenge the government faces right now is whether it can increase the rate to the 1.3 threshold.
The cost of raising a child is excessively high. Children are typically in education from the age of seven to 24, and with the year-on-year cost of putting a child through school about 12 times that of European nations with a welfare state, or four times the cost in the US, these high costs place an extraordinarily heavy burden on parents.
In addition, if a woman leaves her job to give birth, she also sacrifices a great deal in terms of lost potential earnings. Women living in Taipei stand to lose as much as NT$800,000 in lost income if they give up their job to have a child.
The government needs to think more about how to address the high costs of raising children and of women feeling that they have no choice but to continue working.
Yang Wen-shan is a research fellow in the Institute of Sociology at the Academia Sinica.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with