Two years after the onslaught of Typhoon Morakot, the predictions in the book The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism by Naomi Klein are unfortunately being played out. The state, business, charities and other social control organizations are using this “opportunity” to force Aborigines down from the mountains, taking them away from their homes in order to get their hands on their traditional territory.
By contrast, the Aboriginal filmmaker Maywa Biho’s film Light up My Life shows how Aborigines are working hard to turn their situation around, with young Aborigines returning to the Kanakanavu tribe to start growing millet and other traditional crops again.
This is a most astonishing example of how people can adapt to the disasters brought by climate change. What is now no more than a flicker of light at the end of a very long tunnel may well grow ever bigger, ever stronger and ever brighter.
The Kanakanavu tribe, on the banks of Dakanuwa Creek in Greater Kaohsiung’s Namasiya District (那瑪夏), was not damaged by Morakot, but the film shows how the truncated roads are causing serious problems. Some may sigh and say “man cannot conquer nature” and that the mountains must simply be sealed off, but those living in the mountains are also people, and it is important to maintain risk evaluations of the communications, development and ecological situation.
Some of the traditional tribal areas that Aborigines want to return to or rebuild have, for technical reasons, been designated as dangerous areas. If the same stringent standards were applied to the illegal hotels dotting the hillsides around Cingjing Farm (清境農場) in Nantou County, one can only wonder if the reissuing of legal permits would even be discussed, not to mention the nuclear waste storage area in Taitung County’s Daren Township (達仁), where the rock is so soft that even a three-year-old could crush it.
This is not really a question of what is good for the goose, it is more an example of how technical expertise always gets distorted by political and commercial interests.
Look at the reconstruction of the roads connecting this tribe to the outside world. Given that the government had decided that improvements to the Suhua Freeway did not present any real technical problems, there should not be any reason why these far less ambitious road reconstruction projects cannot be completed. The government is building Freeway No. 5, a long cement corridor, just so that tourists will be able to reach Sun Moon Lake faster, making it look environmentally friendly through ecological engineering. If it can do this, of course it can also lower the environmental impact of a small industrial access road to meet safety requirements.
The crux of the problem is cost-efficient analysis and resource distribution. In order to attract Chinese tourism, billions of New Taiwan dollars were spent on improving the Alishan road so that it could accommodate large tour buses.
The road to the tribe, however, was postponed for two years, making it impossible to transport local produce by small trucks and avoid losses. People with chronic illnesses would not go to the hospital because it was so inconvenient to do so, and of course there were delays that put people’s lives at risk.
The Aborigines that have left the mountain areas following the exhortations of government, business and charity organizations have come to identify with the “disaster victim” label given to them by the government. They have been swallowed up by the machine that is global capitalism, leaving behind the land of their ancestors and the diverse lives they had led there, forced to specialize in a single salable skill such as sculpting, singing or dancing.
Worst of all, they have gone from farming in tune with nature and the seasons to working to the clock, perhaps the only farmers in Taiwan, and perhaps the world, to have to do this. This has alienated them from their land and in effect made slaves of them, in what is essentially a return to serf labor.
The film does not contrast life on the mountain with life in the lowlands, as the director focuses on the stories of the women returning to their homes. Other documentaries do exist, which can help us make the comparison.
Millet will disappear from these tribal areas for a variety of complex and multifaceted structural factors. If these women are once again going to have cultural and economic autonomy, they will have to find a way to cultivate food again, and the only way to do this is to remain on the mountain. Academics interested in abstract concepts like germplasm conservation and US “slow food” adherents could learn a lot from them.
Disasters caused by climate change do not affect those who were responsible for it in the first place and the victims equally. It is often the case that the small group of capitalists who are polluting the world benefit, while the people who live on the fragile ecological frontline suffer the most. This is patently unfair and the greatest environmental injustice of the modern world. Taiwan’s Aborigines have found a way to deal with environmental disasters and they are working hard on implementing it. The way they are taking advantage of such crises as a way to start out anew is truly inspiring.
Pan Han-shen is the spokesman of the Taiwan Green Party.
TRANSLATED BY PERRY SVENSSON
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
The image was oddly quiet. No speeches, no flags, no dramatic announcements — just a Chinese cargo ship cutting through arctic ice and arriving in Britain in October. The Istanbul Bridge completed a journey that once existed only in theory, shaving weeks off traditional shipping routes. On paper, it was a story about efficiency. In strategic terms, it was about timing. Much like politics, arriving early matters. Especially when the route, the rules and the traffic are still undefined. For years, global politics has trained us to watch the loud moments: warships in the Taiwan Strait, sanctions announced at news conferences, leaders trading
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
RSS