When Ed Archuleta first arrived in El Paso to manage the local water authority more than 20 years ago the cotton barons and cattle men who run this desert city had a blunt message for him — this is Texas, they said. We don’t do conservation.
It is a good thing Archuleta did not listen. As a record drought scorched the US southwest this spring, El Paso went 119 days without rain. The Rio Grande, which forms the border with Mexico, shrank. An hour’s drive out of town ranchers sold their cattle so they would not have to watch them die.
Archuleta saw no reason for panic — even though, in his words, the amount of precipitation when it did rain was about as much as someone spitting on a water gauge.
“We’re going to be fine this summer,” he said. “We’re basically drought-proof.”
The city will be fine next year too, even if it doesn’t rain and even if the Rio Grande stays low.
“We can handle drought next year. Theoretically, even if we have no water in the river, even if there wasn’t a single drop of water coming from the river, we could make it through the summer,” he said.
Under Archuleta’s leadership, El Paso has emerged as a model to other cities in the southwest forced to adapt in a hurry to a world running out of water.
The long dry spell and declining snowfalls in the mountains because of climate change are forcing cities in Texas and other areas of the southwest into crisis measures.
This year’s historic drought has for the first time triggered water rationing. San Antonio banned all fountains and lawn sprinklers. Galveston asked citizens not to fill swimming pools. Odessa, which may drain its main source of ground water by the end of next year, is thinking of building a reclamation plant.
It has been a shock awakening. According to some projections, 900 communities in the US southwest could go dry by the middle of the century if there is a serious drought, but Texas is a conservative state and there is reluctance to talk about the extreme events caused by climate change.
Texas does not have a central authority to manage ground water. In the lone star state, it’s every one for themselves.
“It is basically a pirate’s approach,” said John Matthews, director of fresh water and climate change at Conservation International. “The right of capture is the legal framework. If you’re able to get it, then it’s yours. If you’re on a river and draw all the water, then it’s just tough luck for the people downstream. If you deplete an aquifer on your land and that aquifer serves a much larger area, then it’s just tough luck to the other people.”
However, El Paso, isolated from the rest of Texas on the border with Mexico and more than 800km away from the state capital, Austin, has always operated a little bit outside the norm.
It was already confronting its own water emergency when Archuleta came to town 22 years ago. The Chihuahua desert city had grown rapidly over the years, because of the Fort Bliss military base and migration from Mexico.
The city had two sources of water — the Rio Grande, whose waters are shared with New Mexico and Mexico, and two underground aquifers.
By the time Archuleta took over El Paso Water Utilities, the city was dangerously close to exhausting its ground water. In some areas of the Hueco aquifer water levels had dropped more than 20m. Fresh water was running out and the water was increasingly brackish.
Meanwhile, demands on the Rio Grande from the expanding populations of El Paso, Las Cruces in New Mexico and Ciudad Juarez across the border were rising.
Archuleta saw two choices — use less water or let the city die. So the water authority encouraged a series of conservation measures. One of the biggest targets was reducing the water sprayed on gardens, which accounted for nearly a third of household use.
Over the years residents were paid US$1 a foot to tear out their lawns and replace them with less thirsty varieties of grass or sand. Neighborhood associations promoted xeriscaping, replacing thirsty imported plants like palm trees with varieties that don’t need much water.
Homeowners were offered rebates to install more efficient air-conditioning systems, washing machines and toilets.
At the same time, the authority invested heavily in treatment plants to recycle wastewater for use on golf courses, cemeteries, school and military parade grounds. It sold the recycled water to industries as coolant and to local farmers. The city now recycles and sells about 12 percent of its wastewater.
The authority also expanded its supply, building a desalination plant — the biggest inland facility in the US — to treat the brackish water from the aquifer. The new facility pumps fresh water back into the aquifer.
Next door, a water museum teaches children about the importance of “purple water” — named after the purple pipes that carry the recycled wastewater — and how to save water at home by watering their gardens less or turning off the faucet when they are brushing their teeth.
It does not immediately look as if El Paso is doing without. The mansions that cling to the hills west of town still have swimming pools and lushly manicured shrubs — but no lawns.
For years, residents have only been allowed to water their gardens on alternate days and only in the early morning or evening in the summer.
By now, such measures are a way of life. El Paso’s per capita water use has dropped in the last 20 years from 754 liters of water a day to 420 liters. That’s barely a quarter of the average daily use in the US, a global water-hog that uses nearly 1,890 liters a day per capita.
Archuleta now believes that El Paso has reached its limit for conservation. Future plans even allow for water use to creep up again — an idea that angers environmental groups.
“They have some conservation programs, sure, but they are still encouraging El Paso to grow at an exponential rate, which is a mistake,” said Bill Addington, a rancher and member of the local branch of the Sierra Club environmental organization. “More people equals more water, no matter how you look at it. El Paso shouldn’t be like an aggressive cancer — just growth and more growth.”
The city’s burgeoning thirst for water means less for everyone else — the farmers who rely on the Rio Grande to irrigate their alfalfa fields and the ranchers.
On George Parada’s land, which runs along the border wall with Mexico, a tributary of the Rio Grande that is ordinarily hip-high has dropped to ankle-deep.
Unless the authorities release more water from the river, there will not be enough grass for grazing. His herd is having to feed primarily on the pods that hang from mesquite trees. The cows are already growing thin.
“Either I’ve got to sell everything and get them out of here or they are going to die,” Parada said.
However, Archuleta does not see how the people of El Paso can do with any less water. He says conservation efforts have gone as far as they can, which brings him to a far more controversial phase of his water plan — securing future supplies.
In recent years the city has bought up 40,400 hectares of land in outlying areas, purchasing the rights to the water that flows underneath. He also foresees the day when it will have to invest in water pipelines, pumping water in from much further away.
“That is our insurance policy,” Archuleta said.
He no longer fears El Paso will run out of water. With proper management, underground aquifers will still have 75 percent of their water in 100 years.
“We decided 20 years ago we had to be prepared for just about everything,” Archuleta said. “When you live out in the desert like we do, it doesn’t hurt to have extra capacity.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with