Amid cheers, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) on Sunday inaugurated his presidential campaign headquarters with a performance put on by a group of about 20 female dancers chanting the slogan “Taiwan cheers, great!”
It is laudable that the organizers wished to inject a dose of vigor and energy into a political activity that has otherwise been perceived by young people as boring. The performance could easily warrant no further discussion, if it were regarded as a mere entertaining intermission aimed at bridging the gap between Ma and the nation’s youth.
However, the campaign headquarters branded the young women dancers as a “secret weapon” and made their performance the centerpiece to the campaign office’s inaugural news conference. It appears that this electioneering gimmick has thus far not been well received. Not only has it left several pan-blue-leaning talking heads frowning with disapproval, members of the general public also find themselves scratching their heads and wondering what sort of mindset Ma’s campaign team harbors when it comes to engaging with young people, many of whom will be first-time voters in the January presidential election.
Many are wondering whether those working on Ma’s campaign are so arrogant that they take young people for fools or whether Ma’s electoral outlook is so bleak that they are desperately trying to woo them with a stage full of dancers flashing their smiles and legs.
Do they not realize that young people want respect and like to be treated as adults? Does every member of Ma’s campaign team believe all young people are blind idol-followers whose minds and hearts can be won over simply by presenting Ma as a celebrity and having him make puffing gestures and act cute on the campaign stage?
Many were reminded of the campaign for Greater Taichung Mayor Jason Hu’s (胡志強) re-election bid last year, which featured a promotional video titled “Hu’s Girls” — twin sisters dancing and singing. How disheartening that Ma must resort to the same tactic in the hope of winning the support of young adults.
The point of the campaign office inauguration should have been to present Ma’s campaign platform, not to surround the presidential candidate of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) — wearing big thumbs-up gloves in an allusion to Facebook’s “like” button — with dancing and cheering young women.
In case Ma’s campaign team has not realized, many of the nation’s young people, after being treated to a pleasant spectacle of dancers in shorts on Sunday, will once again be agonizing over the reality of the hardships they must face thanks to these past three years under Ma’s governance.
To name a few, a recent poll conducted by 1111 Job Bank indicated that the starting salaries for college graduates fall short of their expectations and that the gap appears to be widening. The nation is also faced with a serious youth unemployment problem, with some polls indicating that new graduates are experiencing the same high levels of unemployment as those with high school degrees. A further concern for young adults is the ever-rising price of houses, which are out of the reach of most first-time homebuyers.
These are the issues that the nation’s young voters want Ma and the policymakers in his government to address urgently. They do not want to be served up fluffy dance moves or high-fived by Ma at one of the various campus events he has been so busily engaged with these past weeks.
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS