When the US’ Broadcasting Board of Governors chairman Walter Isaacson championed Voice of America’s decision to shut down its shortwave radio broadcasts to China — and shift those funds to the Internet, cellphones and other forms of digital media — he viewed it as the sensible updating of a propaganda playbook dating from the Cold War.
However, nothing is simple in the world of government broadcasting. Representative Dana Rohrabacher, a Republican and a staunch critic of China, condemned the move, saying it would deprive Chinese listeners of unfiltered news. It amounted, he said, to a US retreat in the face of Beijing’s growing global influence.
“Who knew shortwave in China was a land mine?” Isaacson said.
As the chairman of the Broadcasting Board of Governors, the onetime head of CNN now oversees Voice of America and its four sister networks.
With the administration of US President Barack Obama embarking on a fundamental overhaul of Voice of America and other official broadcasters — one that seeks to adapt their traditional diplomatic missions to the era of Facebook and Twitter — Rohrabacher’s response could be a foretaste of battles to come.
As part of its yearlong review, Isaacson’s board is seeking ways to streamline and modernize Voice of America and its sister networks: Radio Free Europe, Radio Free Asia, Alhurra and Radio and TV Marti. Each service has its protectors in Congress — Cuban-American lawmakers defend Radio Marti, for example — and they are likely to view any change as a threat.
“It’s going to take some tilling of the ground,” said Isaacson, who brings the perspective of both a media executive and an aspiring diplomat (he has been in line for senior jobs at the US Department of State).
While the need for the US to get its message across to an often hostile world is greater than ever, Isaacson said, digital technology risks turning these services into relics of a bygone era, when dissidents in closed societies huddled over their transistor radios for scraps of information from the West.
To be sure, the broadcasters have made significant strides. Voice of America is inviting listeners to file reports about the uprisings in Bahrain on Facebook, while Radio Free Asia is aggressively developing technology to circumvent firewalls that the Chinese government puts up to block its transmissions.
Yet in a brutal budget climate, the money for foreign broadcasting is shrinking. And the competition is relentless. In Egypt alone, 12 new commercial TV channels have sprouted up since the January revolt.
“It’s not the neatly defined world of the Cold War,” said Robert McMahon, a former news director of Radio Free Europe, which reinvented itself after the fall of the Berlin Wall by broadcasting into countries such as Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan. “It’s a crowded, chaotic media marketplace.”
Isaacson’s solution sounds like the blueprint for a state-owned CNN: Create a state-of-the-art global newsroom that would gather all the programming generated by the five networks and send it out via TV, the Web, social-media services, mobile phones — even shortwave, where it still makes sense.
To run Voice of America, Isaacson has recruited David Ensor, a former CNN and ABC News correspondent who is finishing a stint as director of communications and public diplomacy at the US embassy in Kabul. During his two years in Afghanistan, Ensor said, one of his biggest achievements was helping set up an Afghan company that offers SMS text--messaging services.
“Whether it’s Voice of America or my previous employers, CNN or ABC, they need to be on the Internet, on Flickr and on Twitter,” Ensor said by phone from Kabul, where he was packing to leave.
The US government may be the largest broadcaster that few Americans know about. Although its networks reach 100 countries in 59 languages, they are banned from US distribution by a 1948 law devised to prevent the government from turning its propaganda machine on its own citizens. Issacson wants to rewrite that law, saying it is obsolete in the Internet age.
In some countries, Voice of America and Radio Free Europe have iconic brand names and loyal audiences. However, other, newer government broadcasters have a more checkered history. The signals of Radio and TV Marti are jammed by the Cuban government and reach few people in Cuba.
Alhurra, an Arabic-language satellite television service started by former US president George W. Bush’s administration in 2004 to counter the influence of al-Jazeera, has struggled to build an audience in the Middle East. It has also weathered criticism on Capitol Hill for airing the views of militant leaders from Hamas and Hezbollah.
Still, officials said Alhurra attracted record viewers and hits on its Web site during the protests in Egypt, where it was the last network to carry a live feed from Tahrir Square. And its reporters are embedded with rebel fighters in Libya. A NATO airplane is beaming broadcasts into the country.
“It has attracted a sizable new audience; the question is, can it keep that audience?” said Enders Wimbush, chairman of Middle East Broadcasting Networks, which oversees Alhurra and its sister network Radio Sawa.
The broadcasting board is also trying to reallocate money to take account of shifting geopolitical realities. Radio and TV Marti, for example, currently soak up the lion’s share of the total Latin American broadcasting budget. Looking beyond former Cuban president Fidel Castro, the board wants to use Radio Marti’s studios in Miami to broadcast all over the region, said Martin Meehan, a board member.
The overall budget for government broadcasting in this fiscal year is US$748 million, down from US$759 million last year.
China is emblematic of the difficult choices. The Mandarin and Cantonese-language shortwave broadcasts are closely identified with Voice of America; shutting them down will mean letting go 45 longtime employees. However, officials said they reach only 0.1 percent of China’s population.
Radio Free Asia — a so-called surrogate service that focuses on delivering news about China rather than the US — will take over some of Voice of America’s better shortwave frequencies. That is important, officials said, because some jailed political dissidents get news from the service on transistor radios.
Yet “China has moved dramatically from radio to Internet,” said Libby Liu (劉仚), the president of Radio Free Asia.
Liu, the daughter of Taiwanese emigrants, said she spends most of her time trying to figure out how to get around Chinese government firewalls that make it difficult for young people to get Radio Free Asia’s broadcasts on the Internet or their cellphones.
“We have to put circumvention technology on mobile phones,” she said. “The key to reaching people electronically is breaching the firewall.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with