Since first emerging in Tunisia, the “Jasmine Revolution” has faced much resistance, especially in Libya, Yemen and Syria. In China, too, any suggestion of a Jasmine Revolution has been met with severe suppression. In February, when the revolution had just started, Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi said he approved of the Tiananmen Square Massacre, claiming that the suppression of the student movement had been necessary. After two months of bombardment by NATO forces, Qaddafi remains resolute, refusing to step down or go into exile.
Despite frequent civil unrest and unprecedented levels of international pressure, China continues to suppress human rights supporters and dissidents, as well as Christian churches. It seems that neither the Libyan nor the Chinese totalitarian regime will just disappear, although it is likely the Libyan regime will fall first, owing to Western military intervention. China, on the other hand, has been intensifying the suppression of its people — starting with its strong objection to the human rights activist Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波) winning the Nobel Peace Prize — fearing the spread of the nascent Jasmine Revolution of North Africa and the Middle East into China.
From April this year, the Beijing Shouwang Church has been holding services outdoors, persisting even though the Chinese government has responded by arresting worshipers every Sunday for the past seven weeks, and putting still more worshipers and preachers under house arrest. The church has refused to back down and the government has kept up its suppression. Similar treatment has been given to other churches throughout China, such as the Shanghai Wanbang Xuanbao Church, Guangzhou Liangren Church and the Early Rain Reformed Church in Chengdu.
The Shouwang Church began in 1993 as a bible study group of less than 10 people. By 2005, after merging with similar churches, it had expanded into a large church of a thousand members and began renting offices for meetings. In 2006, it applied for permission to establish a church, and the State Administration for Religious Affairs insisted that it obtain an official Three Self Church license. The church declined, wanting to maintain its independent status. After this, the government turned down its application and took action to suppress it, making sure that no one would rent the church members the premises they needed. On Nov. 1, 2009, the church held a get-together in a park, followed by a bigger outdoor service the week after. Nobody was arrested during this time because US President Barack Obama was visiting China at the time.
Later, when the church had purchased a property with funds it had raised itself, the government ensured that it did not receive the keys. The outcome of this was that, having nowhere to hold its services, the church members continued to congregate in outdoor locations and the authorities continued the arrests.
This is by no means an isolated case: There have been many examples of confrontation with the government recently, similar to these clashes with church groups, but by no means restricted to religion. The Mothers of Tiananmen — a group consisting of mothers of the student victims of the Tiananmen Square Massacre who are seeking recompense — for example, has been shunned by the government, and has had its progress hindered and its members detained. It is truly amazing that a totalitarian regime such as this has survived for as long as it has.
Chiu Hei-yuan is a research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of Sociology.
TRANSLATED BY KATHERINE WEI
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
RSS