Ratko Mladic, nicknamed “the Butcher of Bosnia,” joins a who’s who of accused genocidal dictators, warlords and mass murderers at the international war crimes detention center in The Hague.
Set in a leafy suburb, the Scheveningen detention center is already home to the former Bosnian Serb military leader’s one-time political partner, Radovan Karadzic, currently on trial.
Other inmates include former Liberian president Charles Taylor, charged with committing murder, rape and sexual slavery as he sought control of Sierra Leone’s diamond mines or “blood diamonds,” and Thomas Lubanga, the Congo warlord charged with recruiting child soldiers.
Mladic, indicted by an international war crimes tribunal over the killing of 10,000 civilians during the 43-month siege of Sarajevo and for the massacre of 8,000 Muslims in Srebrenica during the 1992 to 1995 Bosnian War, arrived in The Hague late on Tuesday.
Scheveningen’s international complex, housing those awaiting trial for the International Criminal Court (ICC) as well as the Yugoslav and Sierra Leone tribunals, is built next to an old prison where Dutch resistance fighters were imprisoned by the Nazis.
Compared to the prisons in the inmates’ home countries, the detention center seems relatively luxurious.
For a start, there’s the location. This is prime real estate, about 2km from the beach where top properties have views of rolling sand dunes and the whiff of sea spray.
Then there are the facilities: detainees are locked in their cells — single, not shared, and about 10m2 in size — from 9pm to 7:30am, where they can watch television, read or work on their cases.
Each cell in the ICC wing contains a bed, desk, bookshelves, a cupboard, toilet, hand basin and a telephone, although calls are placed by the center’s staff. Detainees can work on their cases using computers but cannot access e-mail or the Internet.
During the day, they are free to mingle and instead of wearing prison uniforms can dress in their own clothes.
However, in the Yugoslavia wing of the detention unit, politics and court cases are taboo topics of conversation, perhaps to stop the discussions from getting too heated.
“There are strict rules in the detention center — conversations about politics and cases are not allowed,” said Sefer Halilovic, a former Bosnian Muslim general who was suspected of murder of Croat civilians during 1992 to 1995, but later acquitted by the tribunal.
Serbian media reported that despite their political differences, detainees who used to be on opposite sides in the 1992 to 1995 war in the Balkans would gather for religious holidays and even exchange presents with one another.
“The war separated us and The Hague has put us together again,” Halilovic wrote in a book about his time in detention.
Others also noted the camaraderie that developed in the detention center.
According to former Macedonian interior minister Ljube Boskovski, who was also acquitted by the tribunal, when Ante Gotovina arrived in The Hague, he was wearing a short-sleeved shirt because he had been arrested in the Canary Islands.
“The problem was resolved when [former Serbian strongman] Slobodan Milosevic lent him a pullover,” Boskovski was quoted as saying.
Gotovina was se-ntenced to 24 years for war crimes against Serbs in Croatia.
With political and legal discussions off-limits, small talk tends to center on food, family and health issues, such as the difficulty of getting access to the local dentist.
One of the most common complaints is the food: The vegetables served al dente are not to everyone’s taste, but detainees can request items from a shopping list and prepare their own food.
“The food is not what we are used to in the Balkans. Vegetables are not cooked well enough and portions are too small so we had to buy our food in the canteen,” Halilovic said
However, his main complaint was the difficulty of getting a dentist appointment because there was only one dentist and a long waiting list. Mladic, whose lawyers have argued that he is in poor health, is very likely to have access to good medical treatment, because the war crimes tribunal will not want another top war crimes suspect to die in detention in The Hague.
Milosevic, who liked to listen to Celine Dion CDs in his cell, died in detention on March 11, 2006, a few months before a verdict in his four-year trial for genocide and other war crimes in Croatia, Bosnia and Kosovo.
The center is located in a prison compound which houses a prison hospital and psychiatric clinic. Common criminals are housed there only if they are undergoing medical treatment, a Dutch Justice Ministry spokesman said.
Despite all the facilities, Halilovic said, “It is still a prison.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with