The government boasts that it has already carried out 173 of the 414 original policy objectives it had set itself, and is working on another 198. However, how far does this accurately reflect the truth? Anyone with a basic grasp of what the central government has been up to over the past few years will shake their heads at this assertion. Its so-called “achievements” are full of holes and are misleading to say the least.
Let’s look at the government’s promise to promote ecological science parks, something planned when the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was still in power. President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) merely inherited the policy, and is now taking the credit for the results.
When the DPP was in government, it planned to have green science parks open for business and the companies all moved in in Greater Kaohsiung, Hualien, Greater Tainan and Taoyuan by June 2006, October 2008, December 2008 and July 2009 respectively. All of this was instigated under the DPP administration, but then Ma took over and saw it through to the end.
If he’s going to claim credit for the green science parks, he should at least come clean about the DPP’s role in their foundation.
Here’s another good one: Four years ago, Ma promised a reforestation drive as part of the “12 i-Taiwan Projects” policy, a promise he never kept.
He said that within eight years he would see the creation of 60,000 hectares of forest land. According to Forestry Bureau statistics, the actual area of new woodland in 2008 was 310 hectares, with another 346 in 2009. If you were to believe Ma’s review report, you would think 14,967 hectares of forest had been created in 2008, followed by another 5,537 in 2009. That makes a total of 20,504 hectares in two years. It does seem that one’s audacity is the true measure of one’s achievement.
The 12 i-Taiwan Projects also included the construction of an MRT connection linking the planned Taoyuan Aerotropolis to the surrounding transportation network.
According to the report, the project is way ahead of schedule, with 70.78 percent of the work complete at the end of April this year, instead of the expected 69.5 percent. The reality is somewhat different. At the time of writing, only 5km of track had been laid. It is actually substantially behind schedule.
Of course, there are a pile of other bounced checks we could mention. Ma also said, for example, that he would oversee the establishment of a department of cultural tourism within a year of becoming president, which would be allocated 4 percent of the total budget before the end of his first term.
Three years down the line and this new department has yet to materialize. Even if the government is reorganized next year, tourism will still be the remit of the Ministry of Transportation and Communications, so any talk about merging culture and tourism is just empty rhetoric.
Ma also promised the provision of long-term care for senior citizens, something else he is welching on.
It also seems to have escaped the government that the population is aging and that the amount of money invested in long-term care for the elderly actually went down to NT$2.3 billion (US$80.2 million) last year from NT$3.1 billion in 2008, when Ma took over.
The above examples are merely the first that come to mind. The government should come clean about them.
Lee Ying-yuan is a former secretary-general of the Democratic Progressive Party.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with