“China, Taiwan: do not use ‘Taiwan.’ This area is considered, within the United Nations system, as a province of China, under the jurisdiction of the Chinese government in Beijing. In general, if it is mentioned, it should be referred to as ‘Taiwan, China.’ The expression ‘Chinese Taipei’ should only be used for the list of participants, summary records and similar documents of World Health Assemblies to which that entity is invited as an observer.”
So read a leaked WHO internal policy statement, which affirmed the denigration of Taiwan’s status at the global health body.
Anyone who takes pride in being Taiwanese and identifies with the Republic of China (ROC) would naturally be infuriated by this blatant disrespect of the country’s dignity. One would think President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) would take the insult even harder, as he is the head of state and is supposed to represent the ROC’s sovereignty as stipulated in the Constitution. But no. Since disclosure of the “WHO house style” on Tuesday, not much opposition has been heard from the Presidential Office.
Last week, Ma shook his fist as he spoke of safeguarding Taiwan’s dignity in the face of the WHO name row. His seeming determination, however, failed miserably to materialize. Not only did Department of Health Minister Chiu Wen-ta (邱文達) refrain from voicing an oral protest during his five-minute speech at the World Health Assembly (WHA), the so-called protest letter Chiu delivered to the WHO avoided asserting the ROC’s sovereignty. Chiu’s performance warrants mention only for how pathetic it was: He belittled Taiwan and his own official status in the letter by referring to himself as “Minister of Department of Health, Chinese Taipei.”
If Ma is determined to safeguard the nation’s dignity, he could instruct Chiu to hold up a placard that reads “under protest” during his WHA attendance as an observer, but, pitifully, he did not. Ma could also have directed Chiu to seize the opportunity by holding an international press conference on the sidelines of the WHA to make Taiwan’s stance on the name dispute known to all internationally. Again, however, Ma did not. So much for trumpeting the ROC’s sovereignty in his speeches and clamoring for the ROC centennial celebrations this year. Now that the time has come for the president to toughen up and assert the nation’s dignity and sovereignty, a wimpy response is all we see.
As a further example of Ma’s superficiality, the president, seeking re-election, has decided to name his campaign headquarters “Taiwan Cheers, Great! (台灣加油, 讚!)” and form a legion of campaign groups called “Taiwan cheer teams (台灣加油隊).”
The striking difference in how Ma and his administration deal with the sovereignty issue at home and abroad leads many to wonder whether the protest letter he sent to the WHO was just a part of his political playacting, and whether he is taking Taiwanese for fools.
Saying that Taiwanese feel flabbergasted is an understatement when describing the extent to which the Ma administration has misled its own people while wimping out on the international stage when it comes to asserting the nation’s dignity.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS