While Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential hopeful Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) recently revealed her vision of a nuclear-free Taiwan, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) seems to be reneging on his promise of establishing an all-volunteer military to replace conscription. Although these two issues might seem unrelated, they reveal the lack of a sense of responsibility in politicians.
Former Academia Sinica president Lee Yuan-tseh (李遠哲), once said that politicians are not necessarily bound to honor promises made during election campaigns. Whether this is correct depends on one’s interpretation of Lee’s statement. It is one thing to feel it means that politicians may break their promises if, after taking office, they are unable to fulfill their pledges despite their best efforts to do so.
However, one cannot agree with Lee’s statement if it is interpreted to mean that politicians have no moral obligation to honor a promise. An assurance made during an election campaign is a contract between a politician and the electorate. An individual gives their sacred vote to a politician because of specific promises and has no recourse if that politician later reneges. The only avenue open to them is to not vote for that politician again.
It is only right to exercise a degree of understanding should a politician be relatively new to politics or if some major catastrophe occurs during their term in office. In such cases, one should be forgiving. However, such latitude should not apply to a politician who has held major positions in central government, who has access to considerable political resources and who acts on their own volition, with no external pressure.
Both Tsai and Ma belong to the latter group.
Even former Atomic Energy Council chairman Ouyang Min-shen (歐陽敏盛), who is in the pan-green camp, questioned Tsai’s non-nuclear stance, saying that a completely non-nuclear Taiwan by 2025 was unworkable, unless we manage to replace it with green energy. Even if Tsai is elected president next year, there is nothing to say that her successor would continue her policies after 2020.
Surely Tsai has not forgotten what she learned during her time in senior positions in central government. How could she not be aware of the realities of Taiwan’s dependence on nuclear power? Did she really only become aware of the danger presented by Taiwan’s nuclear plants after the March 11 Japanese earthquake? If this is an indication of how she is going to perform if she ever makes it into office, one shouldn’t hold out too much hope.
Ma must have known the reality of the situation when he included establishing an all-volunteer military as one of his campaign promises. Now that he is in office, the Ministry of National Defense has announced on several occasions that conscription is to be scrapped on schedule.
Now we hear that because of financial constraints an all-volunteer system is unlikely and that the government has also considered other financing options that will benefit private business groups and not the general public.
Politicians are always big on ideas, if not concrete plans, continually failing to translate words into actions. They make promises, only to later dismiss public concern with various excuses. Both Tsai and Ma have proved to be more astute at academics than governance: That much we can see from the campaign promises they have made.
In the up and coming legislative and presidential elections, the electorate needs to think carefully about whose promises are actually feasible.
Ball Chang is an assistant professor at the Chihlee Institute of Technology’s Department of Applied English.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
In the past month, two important developments are poised to equip Taiwan with expanded capabilities to play foreign policy offense in an age where Taiwan’s diplomatic space is seriously constricted by a hegemonic Beijing. Taiwan Foreign Minister Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) led a delegation of Taiwan and US companies to the Philippines to promote trilateral economic cooperation between the three countries. Additionally, in the past two weeks, Taiwan has placed chip export controls on South Africa in an escalating standoff over the placing of its diplomatic mission in Pretoria, causing the South Africans to pause and ask for consultations to resolve
An altercation involving a 73-year-old woman and a younger person broke out on a Taipei MRT train last week, with videos of the incident going viral online, sparking wide discussions about the controversial priority seats and social norms. In the video, the elderly woman, surnamed Tseng (曾), approached a passenger in a priority seat and demanded that she get up, and after she refused, she swung her bag, hitting her on the knees and calves several times. In return, the commuter asked a nearby passenger to hold her bag, stood up and kicked Tseng, causing her to fall backward and
In South Korea, the medical cosmetic industry is fiercely competitive and prices are low, attracting beauty enthusiasts from Taiwan. However, basic medical risks are often overlooked. While sharing a meal with friends recently, I heard one mention that his daughter would be going to South Korea for a cosmetic skincare procedure. I felt a twinge of unease at the time, but seeing as it was just a casual conversation among friends, I simply reminded him to prioritize safety. I never thought that, not long after, I would actually encounter a patient in my clinic with a similar situation. She had
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
RSS