In a new book by Dan Abrams, Man Down, the legal analyst from ABC TV reached “beyond a reasonable doubt” the conclusion that ”women are better cops, drivers, gamblers, spies, world leaders, beef tasters, hedge fund managers and just about everything else,” based on studies and research.
As political leaders, women are still greatly outnumbered by men, but they have been increasing in number in recent years. Best known among past and present female political leaders are former Israeli prime minister (1969-1974) Golda Meir, former British prime minister (1979-1990) Margaret Thatcher, former Indian prime minister (1966-1977, 1980-1984) Indira Gandhi and German Chancellor Angela Merkel.
Today there are at least 17 countries with a female president or prime minister, including Argentina, Brazil, Australia, Liberia, Bangladesh, Ireland, Iceland, Costa Rica, Finland, Slovakia, Lithuania and Kyrgyzstan. Nearly every major region in the world has a country with a female leader, except East Asia.
This is particularly troubling when Southeast Asia has had two countries (the Philippines and Indonesia) with female leaders in the last three decades. Why not East Asian countries? Confucian patriarchal tradition is so deep-rooted in East Asia that even Japan, the most democratic in the region, has failed to produce a female leader.
True to its name, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) produced a female vice president. Former vice president Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) is deservedly proud of her political achievements during her terms in office from 2000 to 2008.
Understandably, she would very much like to be the first female president of Taiwan and has recently made known her intention to run as a DPP candidate in next year’s presidential election. However, DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) appears to have a much better chance than Lu of becoming not only the first female president in Taiwan, but in East Asia.
Tsai holds graduate degrees from universities in the UK and the US, she was a university professor and she held ranking government positions, including the equivalent of a deputy prime minister. As the behind-the-scenes architect of the “two country” theory, her views and ability to defend Taiwan’s sovereignty are beyond question. In addition, as the chairperson of the DPP since May 2008, she has helped lead the revival and resurgence of the party.
With her calm demeanor, rationality and integrity, Tsai is widely popular in Taiwan. It is fairly clear that she is not only the best qualified female presidential candidate, but simply the best presidential candidate for Taiwan.
It is indeed time for Taiwan’s national interest as well as history that Tsai is nominated by the DPP to be its presidential candidate and then elected directly by the people to become Taiwan’s first female president in March next year.
Chen Ching-chih is a professor emeritus of history at Southern Illinois University Edwardsville.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with