Local media headlined yesterday that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) was irate over the Philippines’ refusal to offer an official apology for its deportation of 14 Taiwanese fraud suspects to China, with footage released from the Presidential Office showing Ma, in his meeting with Philippine President Benigno Aquino III’s special envoy, Philippine Senator Manuel Roxas, solemnly chiding Manila for committing mistakes in its extradition process that were deemed inappropriate behavior for a democratic country.
Okay, so the president was angry. Now what?
Indeed, without spelling out specific stringent measures on the spot to substantiate Ma’s degree of fury over the Philippines’ apparent lack of respect for Taiwan’s sovereignty, it is no wonder that some have come to dismiss Ma’s display of ire on Tuesday as mere show, lacking any real teeth in upholding Taiwan’s sovereignty and dignity.
We previously heard Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) say that an apology by Roxas was a necessary condition for his visit. Yet, following Roxas’ arrival, the envoy has clearly stated that he was not authorized to make any apologies during his visit.
This blatant lapse is unnerving and deeply disturbing. Was the Ministry of Foreign Affairs aware beforehand that Manila’s envoy was not going to apologize? If the ministry did not obtain such information ahead of time, it would indicate the degree of seriousness in the communication breakdown between Taipei and Manila. If the ministry did know, why then, was Roxas in Taiwan? Why did the ministry proceed to arrange for Roxas to meet with the president? While both the ministry and Presidential Office cited diplomatic courtesy as the reason for the Ma-Roxas meeting, the real impression left with the general public, however, was how the Ma administration had degraded the nation’s dignity and that its self-belittling action showed signs of cowardice toward another country that had displayed a complete lack of respect for Taiwan’s sovereignty to begin with.
The ministry noted that points of consensus reached between Minister of Foreign Affairs Timothy Yang (楊進添) and Roxas on Monday included Manila’s plan to take punitive action against officials involved in wrongdoing during the deportation process. According to Yang, Taipei would interpret that as “a kind of apology.”
Pathetic and truly wretched. Not only did the Ma administration fail to stand firm on a non-negotiable demand for Taiwan’s sovereignty and respect, it appeared instead to be helping Manila look for an exit amidst the whole brouhaha.
If this is the way Ma and his officials work in concluding diplomatic spats pertaining to Taiwanese sovereignty and national dignity, one can’t really blame Manila for not respecting Taiwan when it appears Taipei seems to take its own sovereignty and dignity just as lightly.
Just as in the case of Taiwanese taekwondo athlete Yang Shu-chun’s (楊淑君) controversial disqualification from the Asian Games in China in November, in which South Korea without rhyme or reason became the target of many Taiwanese’s anger, the Philippines should not be the party at which Ma directs his anger. Political watchers could easily note China’s invisible hand in the affair no matter how Beijing may have schemed to make it appear as if the spat was only a matter between Taipei and Manila.
Sure enough, we have yet to hear Ma or his government officials utter a word of protest or strong words demanding Beijing return the 14 Taiwanese suspects.
Taiwanese do have a right to be livid from this situation, for they have witnessed their government dare to only admonish the Philippines yet remain silent in the face of the Chinese elephant in the room — all because of a president who continues to base his China policy on a fictitious “1992 consensus” that undermines Taiwan’s dignity and international standing.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with