On Feb. 5, while attending a security conference in Munich, Germany, British Prime Minister David Cameron made a speech attacking multiculturalism. German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who was present at the meeting, applauded Cameron’s speech. In an age in which democratic countries, corporations and universities have all embraced multiculturalism, it comes as a shock to see mainstream politicians launching such a critique.
Multiculturalism means support for the idea that, within a community people can be open about their different identities, including gender, sexual preference and ethnic identity, instead of hiding and having no chance to participate in society or express themselves.
When visiting public places in Taiwan, one often sees posters on display that promote the happy coexistence of different social groups and remind people to respect the elderly and the disabled. The people portrayed on such posters are always smiling and apparently friendly and accepting of one another. These posters are a product of multiculturalism. It is almost as if carrying out the tasks portrayed in them could transform Taiwan into a multicultural society — a progressive and democratic society that respects differences and promotes fairness and justice.
The multiculturalism that posters seek to encourage has its critics, and this is true in Taiwan just as it is in other democracies. Truth be told, posters like this are just a show, and the same can often be said of political propaganda. They pay lip service to various subjects of the moment, but for the most part fail to deliver. Just as with posters, Taiwan’s ubiquitous evening galas often highlight the faces of the underprivileged and disabled. This may offer moral encouragement, but in no way do such activities guarantee that when the fireworks are over, the disadvantaged will be any better off.
Their real needs, such as the right to work and study, healthcare and free interaction with mainstream society, will not be advanced by such events.
From a leftist political view, the problem with multiculturalism is that it does not offer people, especially disadvantaged people, enough benefits.
If multiculturalism is seen as evidence that a society is progressive and democratic, this progress and democracy is like cotton candy — it might be sweet, but it is almost devoid of nourishment.
In contrast, European leaders’ critique of multiculturalism was based on different considerations. In their view, multiculturalism gives people too much. Cameron says Britain has been letting Muslims settle for decades, but that as a group, they have not integrated with mainstream British culture. Rather, they closed their doors and stuck with their own culture — one that outsiders (meaning those who belong to the cultural mainstream) do not understand.
Cameron wants to use economic means to force Muslims to drop those values in their own culture that differ from the values of mainstream Britain. He wants them to join with mainstream culture and accept its values. In Cameron’s view, that is the way minority people can show their love for a united Britain. His aim is to replace multiculturalism with the economically dominant mainstream culture — which is right-wing in nature.
The left is dissatisfied with multiculturalism, but the right wants to demolish it. The effects of multiculturalism may be limited, but without this card in their hands, people belonging to non-mainstream cultures will have a tough time standing up to the mainstream. In addition to keeping a tight hold on the multicultural card, we need to look for new cards to play.
Chi Ta-wei is an assistant professor of Taiwanese literature at National Chengchi University.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
Ahead of US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) meeting today on the sidelines of the APEC summit in South Korea, an op-ed published in Time magazine last week maliciously called President William Lai (賴清德) a “reckless leader,” stirring skepticism in Taiwan about the US and fueling unease over the Trump-Xi talks. In line with his frequent criticism of the democratically elected ruling Democratic Progressive Party — which has stood up to China’s hostile military maneuvers and rejected Beijing’s “one country, two systems” framework — Lyle Goldstein, Asia engagement director at the US think tank Defense Priorities, called
A large majority of Taiwanese favor strengthening national defense and oppose unification with China, according to the results of a survey by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC). In the poll, 81.8 percent of respondents disagreed with Beijing’s claim that “there is only one China and Taiwan is part of China,” MAC Deputy Minister Liang Wen-chieh (梁文傑) told a news conference on Thursday last week, adding that about 75 percent supported the creation of a “T-Dome” air defense system. President William Lai (賴清德) referred to such a system in his Double Ten National Day address, saying it would integrate air defenses into a
The central bank has launched a redesign of the New Taiwan dollar banknotes, prompting questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — “Are we not promoting digital payments? Why spend NT$5 billion on a redesign?” Many assume that cash will disappear in the digital age, but they forget that it represents the ultimate trust in the system. Banknotes do not become obsolete, they do not crash, they cannot be frozen and they leave no record of transactions. They remain the cleanest means of exchange in a free society. In a fully digitized world, every purchase, donation and action leaves behind data.
RSS