In a situation where few can feel the economic recovery and where there is no growth either economically or in the employment rate, the 18 percent preferential interest rate on the savings of military personnel, civil servants and teachers merely serves to reinforce the feeling of unfairness and deprivation among the general public.
A political avalanche is in the making and it will bury the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) if it insists on supporting the 18 percent interest rate for these privileged groups.
The treatment of retired civil servants and the general public could not be more different. We are all citizens of the same nation, but while one group enjoys an 18 percent preferential interest rate on savings, everyone else receives 1 percent.
This is not only unfair, it is outrageous. No matter how the KMT and the government try to defend their position, they convince no one. One reason the reaction has been so vigorous was Examination Yuan President John Kuan’s (關中) explanation that civil servants are simply different from common people.
The Ministry of Civil Service argued that the introduction of reforms including the preferential 18 percent interest rate would save the nation NT$100 million (US$3.45 million) over five years, though this claim was immediately criticized as being less than it seemed.
Currently, the government spends more than NT$75 billion annually financing its preferential interest rate policy. That is almost NT$400 billion over five years of which NT$100 million represents just 0.025 percent.
This system is unfair and it speaks to an historical unfairness that reminds people how the KMT has consistently favored military personnel, civil servants and teachers. Their children have received educational subsidies while those of farmers and workers have not. Military personnel and teachers have also been exempt from paying taxes for decades, a benefit that will only be abolished next year, but they will be reimbursed for any money taken away in taxes.
Which other professions receive such privileged treatment?
Kuan defended the preferential interest rate by saying that civil servants are different from common people and that the country would take care of anyone with the ability to pass the civil service examination. However, any such statement is historically nonsensical when the channels to becoming a civil servant are a root cause of unfairness.
The KMT devised a way to select civil servants based on a provincial quota that was only abolished in 1994 following a constitutional amendment. The quotas were applied to all Chinese provinces, which meant that the acceptance rate for examinees whose home province was Taiwan was much lower than for those of candidates from other Chinese provinces.
In addition, almost 50 percent of soldiers who took the exam to transfer into the civil service were accepted, and they were the first to enjoy the preferential 18 percent interest rate.
This preferential interest rate has created and is creating unfairness, but the government continues to defend it. The KMT lost the township chief by-election in Caotun Township (草屯), Nantou County, the first election in the centennial year of the Republic of China. People are unhappy, and this defeat is only the beginning of a political avalanche that will bring down the KMT and cause it to disintegrate in next year’s legislative and presidential elections.
Hu Wen-hui is a media commentator.
TRANSLATED BY TAIJING WU
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS