In a situation where few can feel the economic recovery and where there is no growth either economically or in the employment rate, the 18 percent preferential interest rate on the savings of military personnel, civil servants and teachers merely serves to reinforce the feeling of unfairness and deprivation among the general public.
A political avalanche is in the making and it will bury the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) if it insists on supporting the 18 percent interest rate for these privileged groups.
The treatment of retired civil servants and the general public could not be more different. We are all citizens of the same nation, but while one group enjoys an 18 percent preferential interest rate on savings, everyone else receives 1 percent.
This is not only unfair, it is outrageous. No matter how the KMT and the government try to defend their position, they convince no one. One reason the reaction has been so vigorous was Examination Yuan President John Kuan’s (關中) explanation that civil servants are simply different from common people.
The Ministry of Civil Service argued that the introduction of reforms including the preferential 18 percent interest rate would save the nation NT$100 million (US$3.45 million) over five years, though this claim was immediately criticized as being less than it seemed.
Currently, the government spends more than NT$75 billion annually financing its preferential interest rate policy. That is almost NT$400 billion over five years of which NT$100 million represents just 0.025 percent.
This system is unfair and it speaks to an historical unfairness that reminds people how the KMT has consistently favored military personnel, civil servants and teachers. Their children have received educational subsidies while those of farmers and workers have not. Military personnel and teachers have also been exempt from paying taxes for decades, a benefit that will only be abolished next year, but they will be reimbursed for any money taken away in taxes.
Which other professions receive such privileged treatment?
Kuan defended the preferential interest rate by saying that civil servants are different from common people and that the country would take care of anyone with the ability to pass the civil service examination. However, any such statement is historically nonsensical when the channels to becoming a civil servant are a root cause of unfairness.
The KMT devised a way to select civil servants based on a provincial quota that was only abolished in 1994 following a constitutional amendment. The quotas were applied to all Chinese provinces, which meant that the acceptance rate for examinees whose home province was Taiwan was much lower than for those of candidates from other Chinese provinces.
In addition, almost 50 percent of soldiers who took the exam to transfer into the civil service were accepted, and they were the first to enjoy the preferential 18 percent interest rate.
This preferential interest rate has created and is creating unfairness, but the government continues to defend it. The KMT lost the township chief by-election in Caotun Township (草屯), Nantou County, the first election in the centennial year of the Republic of China. People are unhappy, and this defeat is only the beginning of a political avalanche that will bring down the KMT and cause it to disintegrate in next year’s legislative and presidential elections.
Hu Wen-hui is a media commentator.
TRANSLATED BY TAIJING WU
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS