Taiwanese universities are developing strategies to cope with an imminent crisis.
Government figures show that in 2008, 97 percent of Taiwanese who wanted to pursue higher education were accepted by Taiwanese universities. So currently, just about everybody who wants to go to university can do so. However, the population demographics of Taiwan are such that over the next 10 years the absolute number of potential university students will decrease. This gradual decrease in students will eventually lead to the closure or restructuring of some of the less popular universities.
To counterbalance this projected decrease in Taiwanese student numbers, many universities are attempting to comply with ministerial objectives to internationalize universities by intensifying their efforts to attract international students to fill the soon to be vacant seats in the lecture theaters.
University recruiting delegations head off in droves to countries with Chinese-speaking communities such as Indonesia and Malaysia, and ultimately China, to attend education fairs designed to win the heads, hearts and purses of foreign students with stories of the dynamic international education to be gained from study at Taiwanese universities.
However, is this the best strategy for Taiwanese universities to pursue en mass?
Is this even a remotely sensible strategy for rural universities to be investing in?
Let us be realistic and put national pride temporarily to one side; we can bring it back into the equation a little further along. Do Taiwanese universities deliver a world class education that would attract international students? Only four Taiwanese universities are ranked in the top 200 in the world. Therefore, it is likely that the majority of the 78 Taiwanese universities are not going to see many of the academically motivated international students.
Are Taiwanese academic qualifications accredited in other countries? No, not without extensive retesting.
Will these recruiting efforts convince non-Mandarin-speaking students to attend Taiwanese universities? No, only a few universities have courses taught in English and many universities don’t offer Mandarin language training courses.
When I question the Taiwanese students that attend the university where I teach, undergraduates tell me they came to this university because they were rejected by their first choice of university and because the tuition fees are cheap. After this, we have reasons like the air is good and the scenery pretty. So, if upper-mid-ranking rural Taiwanese universities are not the first choice of Taiwanese students, is it a credible strategy for the administration of these same universities to focus on recruiting foreign students to make up some of the anticipated enrollment shortfall?
Perhaps rural universities should not be focusing on providing more of the same education. Perhaps they need to re-invigorate the education they provide so that Taiwanese students will want to attend because the education that is provided has world-class value.
Sadly, education is no longer valued for itself, but has become a commodity. So, in this vein of logic, ask yourself what does Taiwan have access to that the economies of the world crave? Like it or not, the answer is simple — cultural and geographic proximity to Chinese-speaking China. For a short period of time, Taiwan has the potential to become a conduit for Western economies and scholarship to access China. However, if Taiwanese rural universities are to effectively exploit this opportunity they need to develop a truly bilingual English-Chinese hybrid education.
Presently, the English-language abilities of many Taiwanese students is grossly inadequate. This is not a reflection of the intellect of the students, but shows that past pedagogical strategies were inadequate. Temporally, there is no critical window for the acquisition of a second language. Morphologically, the human brain remains plastic and capable of learning almost indefinitely. Learning any language, be it first, second or third, is primarily about need and immersion.
Taiwanese rural universities need to couple vision with real commitment and spend a bit of time and money on developing their intellectual infrastructure so that the education they provide will evolve to meet the needs and opportunities of the future, rather than trying to extend the lifetime of the existing, often uninspiring, educational strategies. To strengthen the linguistic basis of the existing university curriculum a draconian change is required.
One possibility is that rural universities would offer a one-year diploma for English language that would be a prerequisite for enrollment in all university degree courses or could be used as a stand-alone certificate by those who do not intend to pursue a university degree.
All students would be required to master a credible level of English before being allowed to enroll in specialist university lectures that will also be taught in English. Lecturers, currently encouraged to teach in English, would have the satisfaction of teaching to students who are competent in English and know that the content of their lectures could be comprehended.
At graduation from university these students would be bilingual and professionally educated. This educational content would be of far greater international value than the Taiwan-centric, nominally international variety that is currently being offered. Once the hybrid bilingual system is established, opportunities beyond those originally anticipated will certainly develop.
So why have some university administrations chosen to recruit foreign students to fill seats and forsaken the opportunity to develop an educational experience that would meet the needs of Taiwanese students and in so doing lift their universities out of the educational doldrums in which they currently languish?
Peter G. Osborne is a guest professor of neuroscience in National DongHua University’s Department of Counseling and Clinical Psychology.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with