One Pinyin system, please
I’m a big fan of WikiLeaks, which recently leaked an English-language transcription of excerpts from a Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) standing committee meeting, which apparently was not reported in the local media, including the Taipei Times. The transcription reads:
“You know the KMT is going to vote to allow ‘free,’ independent travelers to come to Taiwan. How can we leverage their arrival to help close the huge rich-poor divide?” one leader, code-named “English,” asked at the beginning of the session.
“I know!” shouted another DPP member, code-named “Loser,” according to the leak. “Visitors from China can only read simplified characters, and they all use Hanyu pinyin, so let’s change everything we can to Wade-Giles!”
“Brilliant,” said another man. “Let’s put one version of pinyin on our giveaway Taipei maps, another one on the internal bus display, and make sure they’re both different from the signs at the MRT stations, street signs and Google maps. We’ve already made achievements in this area!” he boasted. “If you’re trying to go to Gongguan MRT station, the sign on the bus says ‘Kungkuan.’ Hahaha!” He laughed out loud insanely. “That will really screw with all the foreigners!”
English spoke up. “But how will this help us narrow the rich-poor divide?”
“You’re an idiot,” said Loser, using the colloquial Taiwanese expression for when someone says something either totally stupid or too-intentionally cute. “Taxi drivers are some of the poorest people in Taiwan. After all, statistics show that 95 percent of their time and gas money is spent driving around, trolling for fares. The more foreigners that get lost, the more money the taxi drivers will make!”
“Right!” shouted the unidentified speaker. “At least half of Taiwanese taxi drivers can’t speak Chinese anyway, so their passengers will get hopelessly lost! Maybe confused tourists will get driven to ‘KeeLung!’” he added. “The more taxis foreigners have to take to get where they want to go, the more Taiwan’s rich-poor divide will shrink!”
English agreed: “Yes, the best way to ensure financial prosperity for Taiwan’s poor is to use as many different versions of pinyin as possible!”
I’m surprised that the Taipei Times hasn’t perused this WikiLeaks goldmine of inside information. Where’s Johnny when we need him?
Torch Pratt
Yonghe
Let Chinese see democracy
Your editorial on ARATS Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) (“Security overkill robs envoy, public,” Dec. 23, 2010, page 8) was quite a good read and made a very good point in its conclusion.
The final line suggested that if Taiwanese had the right or opportunity to grill President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in public, then why did the government and police not allow the same treatment to be doled out to the chairman?
A further point could have been made about how after allowing Chen to hear protests, Chinese officials would perhaps start to understand a little bit about what democracy means.
Moreover, using tactics to allow Chen to avoid seeing our national flag also reminds us of the weakness of “Mr Ma’s” government.
The government can only be strong with a strong democracy. Let the Chinese elite hear it and see if back door negotiations continue.
In a true democracy, people’s voices are heard. What a shame that Taiwan seems to be headed in the wrong direction.
Harry Adamopoulos
Taipei City
Sean Lien’s magic bullet
The magic bullet fired on the eve of the special municipality elections has tarnished the democracy of Taiwan. Polls indicate that over 70 percent do not believe this case to be as simple as it seems.
Indeed, there are many doubts and questions surrounding the incident.
After seeing a clip that showed how many “spectators” rushed onto the stage to help Sean Lien (連勝文), creating a human wall and a chaotic scene, it only reinforces the belief of many that this incident is a plot like in the movie The Sting.
It is incredible and surreal that so many “spectators” were so brave and eager to “protect” Lien that they forgot they faced a perpetrator holding a 9mm handgun and four bullets.
A normal reaction would have made the spectators duck and run for cover.
I hope the DPP will stick to its guns in pushing for the establishment of a truth finding committee to get to the bottom of the matter.
Yang Ji-charng
Columbus, Ohio
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with