Looking back at major social events in Taiwan over the last century, I believe that late Yilan County commissioner Chen Ding-nan’s (陳定南) decision to not allow Formosa Petrochemical Corp to build the sixth naphtha cracker in his county had a great impact on the environment and the residents in that area. It was an historic event to which some additional thought should be given.
At the time, many officials spoke up in favor of Formosa Plastics Group when the government was making the environmental impact assessment of the plant, but they failed to examine the group’s environmental record both at home and abroad. In addition, they did not review Taiwan’s environmental protection standards to find out if they were perhaps too lax or whether law enforcement was accurate.
Still, in the face of the high compensation offered by Formosa Plastics Group, Chen made his view very clear when he said that compensation was not the issue, but rather it was whether or not the plant would be allowed, because from the perspective of national land utilization, Yilan was not an appropriate site for the plant.
Albert Einstein once said: “Not everything that can be counted counts and not everything that counts can be counted.”
Chen insisted that economic development and national income were not the only indexes that counted and that Yilan should be a clean place with clean air, mountains and water. This is the reason why Yilan, 20 years later, can produce Kavalan Whisky there.
If we now look at towns and villages around where the sixth naphtha cracker plant ended up being constructed, in Yunlin County, the plant brought with it pollution, fires and toxic gas leaks, threatening and harming the health of local residents. Today, almost all the teachers and students at the surrounding schools need to wear facemasks in class.
What should we do now? Should the plant be relocated or the schools? Perhaps the best choice for Yunlin County Commissioner Su Chih-fen (蘇治芬), as she faces problems from the plant’s pollution, is to look back at how Chen handled the case: Compensation is not an issue; the issue is whether the plant can be relocated.
Chan Chang-chuan is a professor at National Taiwan University’s College of Public Health
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
China’s recent aggressive military posture around Taiwan simply reflects the truth that China is a millennium behind, as Kobe City Councilor Norihiro Uehata has commented. While democratic countries work for peace, prosperity and progress, authoritarian countries such as Russia and China only care about territorial expansion, superpower status and world dominance, while their people suffer. Two millennia ago, the ancient Chinese philosopher Mencius (孟子) would have advised Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) that “people are the most important, state is lesser, and the ruler is the least important.” In fact, the reverse order is causing the great depression in China right now,
This should be the year in which the democracies, especially those in East Asia, lose their fear of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China principle” plus its nuclear “Cognitive Warfare” coercion strategies, all designed to achieve hegemony without fighting. For 2025, stoking regional and global fear was a major goal for the CCP and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), following on Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Little Red Book admonition, “We must be ruthless to our enemies; we must overpower and annihilate them.” But on Dec. 17, 2025, the Trump Administration demonstrated direct defiance of CCP terror with its record US$11.1 billion arms
As technological change sweeps across the world, the focus of education has undergone an inevitable shift toward artificial intelligence (AI) and digital learning. However, the HundrED Global Collection 2026 report has a message that Taiwanese society and education policymakers would do well to reflect on. In the age of AI, the scarcest resource in education is not advanced computing power, but people; and the most urgent global educational crisis is not technological backwardness, but teacher well-being and retention. Covering 52 countries, the report from HundrED, a Finnish nonprofit that reviews and compiles innovative solutions in education from around the world, highlights a
RSS