People in Taiwan have long seemed to be tangled in a web of issues pertaining to historical origins, differentiating one another with labels such as wai-shengren (外省人) — Mainlanders who fled from China with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) after 1949 — or the benshengren (本省人), those who came to Taiwan from China centuries ago. Recent reports on the outpouring of love and care for Chin Heng-wei (金恆煒), however, have debunked claims that a “provincial complex” (省籍情結) divides the people in this country.
A fundraiser was held last week for Chin, a political commentator known for his outspoken pro--Taiwan independence stance. The fundraiser was initiated as a means to help Chin, who is embroiled in financial difficulties because of multiple lawsuits against him. The financial burden is expected to take a bigger toll on him following his diagnosis with pancreatic cancer in August.
Little did the fundraiser organizers know that they were in for a jaw-dropping success. Within one week, more than NT$23 million (US$744,000) was raised, well beyond the initial objective of NT$5 million.
The remarkable sum that was gathered within such a short period surely comes as heartwarming news and a testimony to Taiwanese benevolence.
That the majority of the sum came in the form of small donations by members of the public further demonstrated that many people, at least among pan-green supporters, have moved beyond the “provincial complex,” dashing the purported ethnic barriers.
Chin fits well in the category of so-called wai-shengren, having been born in Zhejiang Province and speaking hardly a word of Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese).
That, however, has not stopped the pan-greens, characterized by their pro-independence stance, from embracing Chin and extending a helping hand.
It’s no secret that whenever elections roll around, some politicians are quick to play the “provincial” or “ethnic” card, using it as a campaign tool to manipulate tensions in their favor.
The successful fundraising efforts for Chin has demonstrated that the labels waishengren and benshengren no longer play a significant role among the pan-green electorate. As suggested by Chin’s case, it doesn’t matter if one is a waishengren or ben-shengren; so long as people manifest love for Taiwan through deeds, they are embraced by the pan-greens as Taiwanese.
It subsequently came to many a mind that in October 2007, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), then the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate, also proclaimed his devotion to Taiwan.
Citing a speech by French President Nicolas Sarkozy in a talk about Taiwanese identity, Ma, alluding to Sarkozy’s remark that “What makes us French is not only that we were born in France but also that we choose to stay in France,” also touted his love for Taiwan.
Two years into his presidency, however, Ma still questions why the opposition often doubts his stance and attachment to Taiwan.
Ma is well advised to look at Chin and learn a thing or two, for the president’s profession of love for this country counts for very little when such rhetoric comes only when election time rolls around.
The Chin story is a soothing and encouraging example that ethnic identification is melting away among the public. One can only hope that politicians could arrive at such a conclusion as well.
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
President William Lai Ching-te’s (賴清德) May 20 second-anniversary address was not just a routine policy review; it was damage control. US President Donald Trump’s remarks — that he did not want to see anyone move toward independence and that the delivery of a major Taiwan arms package could depend on the progress of US-China relations — unsettled Taiwan’s public and created an opening for opposition parties to question whether Taiwan was being treated as a bargaining chip in Washington’s dealings with Beijing. Lai’s speech was designed to close that opening. The address covered the expected ground: sovereignty, cross-strait relations, defense spending,
RSS