China is seeking to meet its targets for saving energy and cutting carbon dioxide emissions by enforcing limits on electricity consumption, suspending production where necessary and even forcing energy-hungry factories to close down altogether. Taiwanese manufacturers are hoping to reap extra profits when these measures push up the prices of products made by such factories.
As controversy rages in Taiwan over whether construction of a coastal industrial complex by Kuokuang Petrochemical Technology Co should be allowed to go ahead, what signals do the actions of the Chinese government send to Taiwan?
In China it is commonplace for the government to use administrative measures to adjust market supply and demand, and neighboring countries are quite used to it. What is surprising this time is that the stated reason for the measures is to cut energy use and carbon dioxide emissions. China’s move is a sharp contrast to Taiwan’s attitude.
The Taiwanese government has never set a target date or an amount for reducing carbon dioxide emissions, and it is hard to imagine it ordering conglomerates to shut down production. If such a thing were to happen, elected politicians would be lining up to complain that if businesses were to suspend work, their employees would have to take unpaid leave and their livelihood would suffer as a result.
As China enforces power consumption limits and orders factory shutdowns, Taiwanese factory bosses who stand to benefit from reduced competition — especially energy-guzzling and high-polluting industries — probably see this as a chance to increase production and make more profit, while pumping out more pollution into Taiwan’s environment.
At the same time they would no doubt seize the opportunity to claim that if they were to build factories in China, they would face the problem of having their electricity supply capped or ordered to suspend operation at any time without warning.
In order to thwart this threat to their profits and to avoid disrupting upstream and downstream supply, they would claim that factories like the planned Kuokuang petrochemical plant should be located here in Taiwan.
What a sorry prospect! For many decades industrialized countries have kept moving their production to emerging countries like Taiwan and South Korea. For a decade or more now they have been moving them to China, Vietnam and other developing countries.
Who would have thought that communist China would limit power supplies to factories or have them closed down on environmental grounds, or that the conclusion drawn would be that it would be better for energy-hungry and highly polluting industries to be located in Taiwan?
If such an idea holds sway, when will Taiwan ever see clear blue skies? When will we ever find a way to maintain economic growth while cutting pollution and carbon dioxide emissions?
The current government has given the green light to many dirty and power-hungry factories since it took office in 2008. If the Kuokuang plant gets the go-ahead as well, there will be no chance of seeing clear skies or environment-friendly growth within the next 20 years.
The truth of the matter is that Taiwan’s market economy is dominated by big businesses. Government agencies are powerless to set annual targets for cutting emissions, never mind enforcing them. Taiwan has for a long time held the prices of water, electricity and oil below those of other Asian countries.
The government would have us believe that this has been done so that the public would not be burdened by rising prices. The true beneficiaries, however, are factories that guzzle water and energy. So in fact Taiwan has been running communist-style price controls for a long time.
Although the Copenhagen Accord was signed last year, with the US and China exerting the strongest influence, hardly anyone believes the UN Climate Change Conference to be held in Cancun, Mexico, later this year, will see any new protocols signed. China’s unexpected move toward making good on its promised targets for energy savings and emissions cuts shows that it means business.
Should Taiwan be happy or worried? If young people in their 20s and 30s are fated to “enjoy” another 20 years of polluted and carbon-dioxide-laden air, will they choose to stay in Taiwan and work for the country’s future or will they look for any chance to pack up and leave?
Liu Chung-ming is a professor of atmospheric sciences at National Taiwan University.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS