In a speech last Saturday, Academia Sinica President Wong Chi-huey (翁啟惠) said that: “Taiwanese industry is heavily concentrated in electronics-related fields and the business model is based on contract manufacturing. Although the production value for 17 different products are the world’s highest, Taiwan’s economic growth has seen a downward trend in recent years. What we should be considering today is whether or not this is the industrial model for future sustainable development.”
Wong’s concern for the Taiwanese economy and the fact that he uses his position to highlight these concerns is laudable. Readers should also read the editorial in the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) from Monday, which is an astute in-depth analysis of why the economy has been slowing down in recent years. I want to further clarify why the Taiwanese business model is focused on contract manufacturing and why Taiwanese industry is heavily concentrated in electronics-related fields.
Why contract manufacturing? If we discard any ideological ideas of a “greater China,” the answer is quite easy to see: Over the past 20 years, businesses have been moving to China and neglected research and development and industrial upgrading. It is not appropriate to rely on the contract manufacturing business model for too long.
As evidence that people are aware of this, the issue has been discussed for the past 20 years. However, it has been too easy for Taiwanese businesses to move to China, and as a result, they have neglected industrial upgrading and research and development. It’s not that there haven’t been any warnings, but pro-Chinese academics and media outlets singing praise for China have been louder.
Over the past few years, the “incisive analysis” provided by pro-Chinese businesses, officials and academics has been limited to talk about consolidating resources, raising competitiveness and the win-win situation created by taking orders in Taiwan and placing production in China, as they have attempted to justify the “go west” policy.
However, how about the concentration in the electronics-related industries? Once again the answer is very easy to see. Since other industries have been mesmerized by the massive size of the Chinese market, Taiwan has been left with electronics-related industries, such as integrated circuit, semiconductor, panel and computer manufacturers — the fact is that even computer manufacturers have moved to China since 2000, following former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) “active opening” policy.
In other words, these are the industries that were left in Taiwan by former president Lee Teng-hui’s (李登輝) “no haste, be patient” policy — every industry that was not prohibited from doing so, moved to China, leaving the false impression that the electronics industry was the largest.
The question is if Taiwan would have had any companies left in the electronics, integrated circuit, panel or petrochemicals industries today if it hadn’t been for Lee’s ban on them moving to China in 1996, or if Taiwan would have enjoyed 3 percent to 4 percent annual growth after 2000 without these industries?
Wong seems to only have seen the symptoms of these flaws without exploring the reasons for them. That is the only way to explain why he thinks the main reason for Taiwan’s economic decline in recent years has been the result of the heavy concentration of Taiwan’s industry in the electronics-related fields.
In other words, Wong shouldn’t be blaming the big electronics-related industries. Rather, he should ask why Taiwanese governments over the past 10 years have allowed industries, without any restrictions, to move to China and cause more than 2 million Taiwanese to pursue their livelihoods there instead of in Taiwan.
This should make it clear that thinking about and responding to this situation should include doing everything possible to prevent the Taiwanese economy from becoming part of a “one China” market. It should also include demanding that businesses take an international view from a base in Taiwan so that the 2 million Taiwanese who now live and work in China return home and once again start working to promote Taiwan’s economic development. It is this model that should be the model for the future sustainable development Wong said we should be considering.
Huang Tien-lin is a former national policy adviser to the president.
Translated by Perry Svensson
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS