Taiwan is no stranger to extreme weather. The 2001 typhoon season, which lasted from about May to December, comes to mind. That was the year Typhoon Nari did a U-turn as it headed toward Okinawa, parked over open water to gain strength and finally inundated Taiwan as it slowly drifted southward. It was the seventh of nine typhoons to hit Taiwan that year, striking just two months after Typhoon Toraji caused flash floods in Hualien, Taitung and Nantou counties that killed more than 200 people and caused nearly NT$7.7 billion (US$240.2 million) in agricultural and infrastructure damage.
Torrential rains brought by Nari caused roughly NT$2.9 billion in damage and claimed 100 lives, with most of the fatalities taking place in and around Taipei City. The city’s MRT system was severely damaged because of flooding, with entire lengths of track completely submerged. Parts of the system were down for as long as six months and it took millions of dollars to clean up the mess.
Then, just over a year ago, Typhoon Morakot struck southern Taiwan, doing more damage than any typhoon in the nation’s history. The category-1 storm killed more than 800 people, burying whole villages in mountainous areas of Kaohsiung County under tonnes of rock and mud, cut off towns and destroyed bridges. The fiscal hit was huge — more than US$6 billion in damage. A year later, affected families are still trying to cope with the aftermath, with many forced to relocate to areas without jobs and others mourning the loss of loved ones.
Against this backdrop of growing climactic disaster in Taiwan, the sheer scale of the global weather crisis has been particularly notable this year.
Flooding in Pakistan has been so bad that nearly 20 million people have been affected. World Bank and UN officials say that the international aid trickling in is nowhere near enough for the monumental task of helping millions of flood-affected families.
Indian Kashmir has also been hit with flash floods this year that have killed hundreds in the heavily visited area of Ladakh. On the other side of the Himalayas, in China, July floods triggered landslides in Sichuan and Gansu Provinces that took out high-rise buildings and resulted in the deaths of hundreds. The flooding of the Yalu River, which demarcates the border between China and North Korea, destroyed crops in a country that faced a devastating famine in the 1990s, forcing “dear leader” Kim Jong-il to once again beg for food aid from his large neighbor to the north.
With all these weather-induced crises, it is not unreasonable to ask how well prepared Taipei City is. Worryingly, it turns out that the city is spending its emergency funds on flowers, and dubiously priced flowers at that.
On July 19, Taipei City Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Councilor Wu Su-yao (吳思瑤) accused the city of spending more than 70 percent, or NT$500 million, of its secondary reserve fund — to be used in case of emergency — on preparations for the Taipei International Flora Expo. That is on top of the NT$9 billion already being spent on the expo.
DPP Taipei City Councilor Hsu Chia-ching (徐佳青) added that the city government had better pray there are no emergencies or disasters in the second half of this year, because it has no money to deal with any unforseen eventualities.
Although it has been a relatively storm-free typhoon season this year, it is not over yet. It seems a dangerous gamble to bet all of the city’s emergency money on flowers while crossing one’s fingers and hoping no major typhoons hit the Taipei area.
Unfortunately, Taipei Mayor Hau lung-bin (郝龍斌) is only now beginning to wake up and smell the crisis he helped create.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS