Revolutions, it is often claimed, do not happen when people are desperate. They occur in times of rising expectations. Perhaps that is why they so often end in disappointment. Expectations, usually set too high to begin with, fail to be met, resulting in anger, disillusion and often in acts of terrifying violence.
Japan’s change of government last year — when the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) broke the almost uninterrupted monopoly on power held by the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) since 1955 — was not a revolution. However, rather like the election of the first black president in the US, it did fizz with popular expectations, promising a fundamental shift from the past.
This was even truer of Japan than the US. The DPJ not only put many new faces into power, it was going to change the nature of Japanese politics. At last, Japan would become a fully functioning democracy and not a de facto one-party state run by bureaucrats.
To judge from the Japanese press, as well as the DPJ’s plunging poll ratings, disillusion has already set in. The permanent bureaucracy proved resistant and DPJ politicians, unaccustomed to power, made mistakes. One of the worst was Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan’s announcement in June of a consumption-tax hike just before the Upper House elections, which the DPJ went on to lose badly.
The other disappointment has been the government’s failure to get the US to move its Marine airbase out of Okinawa. This promise by the DPJ was meant to be part of Japan’s new assertiveness, a first step away from being a mere “aircraft carrier” for the US, as a former LDP prime minister once described his country.
If Japan’s status quo is to change, the country’s oddly skewed relationship with the US is a key factor. Too much dependence on US power has warped the development of Japanese democracy in ways that are not always sufficiently recognized by the US.
warped
Japan’s one-party state, under the conservative LDP, was a product of World War II and the Cold War. Like Italy, its old Axis partner during the war, Japan became a front-line state in the battle against communist powers. As in Italy, a right-wing party, backed by the US dominated politics for decades, denying the left any chance to take power. Even former Japanese war criminals, one of whom became prime minister in the late 1950s, turned into subservient allies of the US in the wars (hot and cold) against communism.
In fact, Japanese dependence on the US was even greater than that of Italy and other European powers. West European armies were embedded in NATO. Japan, whose armed forces were entirely blamed for driving the country into the catastrophic Pacific War, was not even supposed to have an army or navy after the war. During their occupation of Japan in the 1940s, the US wrote a new pacifist Constitution, which made the use of Japanese military force abroad unconstitutional. In matters of war and peace, Japan abdicated sovereignty.
Most Japanese were happy to be pacifists and concentrate on making money. Japanese governments could devote their energy to building up the country’s industrial wealth, while the US took care of security, and by extension much of Japan’s foreign policy. It was an arrangement that suited everyone: The Japanese became rich, the US had a compliant anti-communist vassal state and other Asians, even communist China, preferred Pax Americana to a revival of Japanese military clout.
However, this strategy came with a steep political price. A democracy that is over-dependent on an outside power and monopolized by one party, whose main role is to broker deals between big business and the bureaucracy, inevitably becomes stunted and corrupt.
political price
Italy, under the Christian Democrats, had the same problem. However, the end of the Cold War in Europe changed the political status quo — with mixed results, to be sure. Old parties lost power, which was a good thing. The vacuum was filled in Italy by the rise of Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, which may have been less of a good thing. In East Asia, by contrast, the Cold War is not yet entirely over. North Korea still causes trouble, and China is nominally a communist state.
However, it is a very different world from the one left in ruins in 1945. For one thing, China has become a great power and Japan, like other Asian countries, must adapt to new circumstances. Although it is the only Asian democracy able to balance the power of China, the system established after World War II is not well suited to this task.
This was recognized by the DPJ, which would like Japan to play a more independent role, as a more equal ally, rather than a mere protectorate of the US, and thus be a more assertive political player in Asia. Hence, the first symbolic step was to get the US to move its marines from Okinawa, an island that has carried the burden of a US military presence for much too long.
The US did not see things that way. The DPJ threatened to change comfortable old arrangements, whereby the US could more or less tell the Japanese what to do. As a result, the US showed little patience with Japan on the question of Okinawa, and has barely concealed its contempt for the DPJ government, feeding popular disappointment with its performance so far.
The US seems to prefer an obedient one-party state to a difficult, faltering, but more democratic partner in Asia. US President Barack Obama’s administration, struggling to fulfill its own promises of change, should be more understanding of its Japanese counterpart. If the US is as serious about promoting freedom abroad as it claims, it should not be hindering the efforts of one of its closest allies to strengthen its democracy.
Ian Buruma is professor of democracy and human rights at Bard College, New York.
COPYRIGHT: PROJECT SYNDICATE
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs