Taipei City is preparing for the Taipei International Flora Expo, to be held from Nov. 6 to April 25. The expo aims to showcase “the essence of gardening, science and environmental protection technology,” and to “combine culture and art as parts of eco-friendly living.” Besides these eloquent goals, the expo also represents an effort by Taipei City to compete with Kaohsiung, which hosted last year’s World Games, and Shanghai, which is hosting the World Expo.
However there seems to be one major snag: The city government is apparently alone in its enthusiasm. Taipei’s residents seem apathetic, quite a few people think the NT$12.8 billion (US$400 million) being spent on the expo is a waste of money and the city government’s plans and actions have been the target of wide-ranging criticism.
Although the city government said it wants to improve Taipei’s ecology and increase the green areas in the city, it has removed more than 1,000 trees from the Taipei Art Park and the Chungshan Park to make room for the expo. Removing trees to plant flowers and building a large temporary exhibition hall run counter to the goal of demonstrating ways to reduce carbon emissions. Allocating NT$12.8 billion budget to plant trees would have been a much more effective way to increase the city’s green areas and reduce carbon emissions.
The city government has also relocated 49 elderly families who lived close to the Yuanshan MRT station to make way for the exhibition hall. The forced removal of old and disadvantaged people for the sake of a temporary activity is not a very humanitarian act.
The Flora Expo also claims to emphasize the combination of culture and art. This will be done by arranging 6,000 art activities in conjunction with the expo. However, such a massive mobilization of resources for a temporary exhibition will ultimately limit many long-term, grassroots cultural activities.
The city government is also promoting urban renewal and beautification through a plan called Taipei Beautiful (台北好好看). Apart from making some remote corners of the city look a bit prettier, these efforts have only served to drive up local real estate prices. It has been calculated that the NT$12.8 billion could be used to build 4,100 apartments and solve housing problems for 15,000 people. Clearly, the city government is only concerned about superficial urban embellishment and is ignoring the substantive issue of how urban space is distributed.
The city’s residents and taxpayers have not been consulted in the decision to spend such a huge sum of money on this event, nor has there been any information about the city government’s plans after the expo closes. City residents do not know what ultimate purpose the exhibition has or what substantial changes the NT$12.8 billion will bring once the exhibition has closed. Huge sums of taxpayers’ money is being spent to create a superficial and temporary flash of beauty, only to create a feeling of political achievement and to bolster Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin’s (郝龍斌) chances of re-election.
The exhibition’s beautifully worded goals are there for rhetorical purposes only. The driving force is to create a huge commercial opportunity by attracting large numbers of tourists, with officials forecasting 6 million visitors — although few observers think it will attract many international tourists.
Taiwan cannot compete with China when it comes to hosting this kind of event, whether in terms of the money spent or scale. It would be ridiculous to compare the Flora Expo with the World Expo in Shanghai. Unfortunately, the areas where Taiwan can shine — innovation and democracy — are sorely missing from this event.
The expo is like a plant that has not been watered, and it will wither and die once the exhibition is closed. No matter how hard the city government tries, Taipei will never be a city of flowers.
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
US President Donald Trump recently repeated his claim that “Taiwan stole America’s chip industry,” reigniting public debate on the issue. As a former Taiwanese minister of economic affairs and an entrepreneur deeply involved in semiconductor supply chain development, I feel a responsibility to clarify this misunderstanding. From the perspective of global industrial evolution and the economic principle of comparative advantage, such a statement appears overly simplistic and risks obscuring the essence of the issue. The rise of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry was not built on “replacing America,” but rather emerged as a result of countries pursuing different development paths within the
RSS