Last week we issued an appeal here for President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) to open his ears and listen to his people. Apparently, this call also fell on deaf ears, judging by his failure to meet with farmers who came to Taipei to plead their case.
Enraged by the Miaoli County Government’s seizure of their farmland, Dapu (大埔) farmers from the county’s Jhunan Township (竹南) camped outside the Presidential Office on Saturday night in the hope that the overnight demonstration would finally draw the president’s attention to their plight. Taking part in the sit-down protest were students, civic organizations and farmers from different parts of the country, who wanted to show their support for the Dapu farmers.
However, their fervor was met with rejection.
Citing prior engagements, Ma instructed the director of the Presidential Office’s Public Affairs Office, Chen Yung-feng (陳永豐), to receive the group’s appeal. Chen met the group for a mere two minutes.
Ma’s less-than-sincere show of concern was disheartening to say the least. Granted the president was preoccupied with meeting Lai In-jaw (賴英照), who had tendered his resignation as president of the Judicial Yuan, but couldn’t he spare at least five or 10 minutes to meet the protesters — especially considering that the farmers had camped out in the summer heat hoping that the president would listen, in person, to their plea? Surely the farmers would not have minded waiting another few hours for the chance to have a brief meeting with the president.
As Taiwan Rural Front spokeswoman Tsai Pei-hui (蔡培慧) poignantly put it: “When [Ma] visited farming villages during his presidential campaign, he was given a warm welcome and he received farmers’ votes. Now that the farmers have come knocking on his door to voice their opposition to the government forcibly taking their land, the president refuses to see them.”
Ma’s indifference to the farmers’ plea, which has been voiced since June 9 when the Miaoli County Government unexpectedly sent excavators to dig up their rice paddies in Dapu, stands in sharp contrast to the speed and efficiency he displayed in response to pan-blue supporter and writer Chang Hsiao-feng’s (張曉風) appeal in May.
One day after Chang knelt in front of TV cameras begging the government to reconsider its plan to turn a plot of land in Taipei City’s Nangang District (南港) into a biotech research park, Ma instructed Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) to take Chang’s appeal into consideration.
Ma was also swift to respond to reports in January that Chiang Mei-hua (江美華), a long-time Ma supporter, had lost her admiration for the president. Shortly after, Ma flew to Hualien and paid Chiang a special visit, resulting in Chiang saying the president was back on her list of idols.
While it’s comforting to see the president responding to concerns voiced by members of the public such as Chang and Chiang, his lack of response to the Dapu farmers’ appeal is disturbing, and leaves some wondering whether the president has selective hearing.
Being the head of the state means caring for the public well-being regardless of their political inclination. If Ma’s response is predicated on the assumption that the farmers are pan-green supporters, he is the one sowing the divide among Taiwanese and has failed to live up to his self-anointed title of the “people’s president” (全民總統).
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
As the highest elected official in the nation’s capital, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) is the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) candidate-in-waiting for a presidential bid. With the exception of Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕), Chiang is the most likely KMT figure to take over the mantle of the party leadership. All the other usual suspects, from Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) to New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) to KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) have already been rejected at the ballot box. Given such high expectations, Chiang should be demonstrating resolve, calm-headedness and political wisdom in how he faces tough
RSS