Last week we issued an appeal here for President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) to open his ears and listen to his people. Apparently, this call also fell on deaf ears, judging by his failure to meet with farmers who came to Taipei to plead their case.
Enraged by the Miaoli County Government’s seizure of their farmland, Dapu (大埔) farmers from the county’s Jhunan Township (竹南) camped outside the Presidential Office on Saturday night in the hope that the overnight demonstration would finally draw the president’s attention to their plight. Taking part in the sit-down protest were students, civic organizations and farmers from different parts of the country, who wanted to show their support for the Dapu farmers.
However, their fervor was met with rejection.
Citing prior engagements, Ma instructed the director of the Presidential Office’s Public Affairs Office, Chen Yung-feng (陳永豐), to receive the group’s appeal. Chen met the group for a mere two minutes.
Ma’s less-than-sincere show of concern was disheartening to say the least. Granted the president was preoccupied with meeting Lai In-jaw (賴英照), who had tendered his resignation as president of the Judicial Yuan, but couldn’t he spare at least five or 10 minutes to meet the protesters — especially considering that the farmers had camped out in the summer heat hoping that the president would listen, in person, to their plea? Surely the farmers would not have minded waiting another few hours for the chance to have a brief meeting with the president.
As Taiwan Rural Front spokeswoman Tsai Pei-hui (蔡培慧) poignantly put it: “When [Ma] visited farming villages during his presidential campaign, he was given a warm welcome and he received farmers’ votes. Now that the farmers have come knocking on his door to voice their opposition to the government forcibly taking their land, the president refuses to see them.”
Ma’s indifference to the farmers’ plea, which has been voiced since June 9 when the Miaoli County Government unexpectedly sent excavators to dig up their rice paddies in Dapu, stands in sharp contrast to the speed and efficiency he displayed in response to pan-blue supporter and writer Chang Hsiao-feng’s (張曉風) appeal in May.
One day after Chang knelt in front of TV cameras begging the government to reconsider its plan to turn a plot of land in Taipei City’s Nangang District (南港) into a biotech research park, Ma instructed Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) to take Chang’s appeal into consideration.
Ma was also swift to respond to reports in January that Chiang Mei-hua (江美華), a long-time Ma supporter, had lost her admiration for the president. Shortly after, Ma flew to Hualien and paid Chiang a special visit, resulting in Chiang saying the president was back on her list of idols.
While it’s comforting to see the president responding to concerns voiced by members of the public such as Chang and Chiang, his lack of response to the Dapu farmers’ appeal is disturbing, and leaves some wondering whether the president has selective hearing.
Being the head of the state means caring for the public well-being regardless of their political inclination. If Ma’s response is predicated on the assumption that the farmers are pan-green supporters, he is the one sowing the divide among Taiwanese and has failed to live up to his self-anointed title of the “people’s president” (全民總統).
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
The recent aerial clash between Pakistan and India offers a glimpse of how China is narrowing the gap in military airpower with the US. It is a warning not just for Washington, but for Taipei, too. Claims from both sides remain contested, but a broader picture is emerging among experts who track China’s air force and fighter jet development: Beijing’s defense systems are growing increasingly credible. Pakistan said its deployment of Chinese-manufactured J-10C fighters downed multiple Indian aircraft, although New Delhi denies this. There are caveats: Even if Islamabad’s claims are accurate, Beijing’s equipment does not offer a direct comparison
To recalibrate its Cold War alliances, the US adopted its “one China policy,” a diplomatic compromise meant to engage with China and end the Vietnam War, but which left Taiwan in a state of permanent limbo. Half a century later, the costs of that policy are mounting. Taiwan remains a democratic, technologically advanced nation of 23 million people, yet it is denied membership in international organizations and stripped of diplomatic recognition. Meanwhile, the PRC has weaponized the “one China” narrative to claim sovereignty over Taiwan, label the Taiwan Strait as its “internal waters” and threaten international shipping routes that carry more
RSS