To recalibrate its Cold War alliances, the US adopted its “one China policy,” a diplomatic compromise meant to engage with China and end the Vietnam War, but which left Taiwan in a state of permanent limbo.
Half a century later, the costs of that policy are mounting. Taiwan remains a democratic, technologically advanced nation of 23 million people, yet it is denied membership in international organizations and stripped of diplomatic recognition. Meanwhile, the PRC has weaponized the “one China” narrative to claim sovereignty over Taiwan, label the Taiwan Strait as its “internal waters” and threaten international shipping routes that carry more than 20 percent of global trade.
This is no longer just Taiwan’s problem. If China were to subjugate Taiwan, the ripple effects would endanger the global order. Taiwan produces more than 90 percent of the world’s most advanced semiconductors. Losing access to or control of that capability would derail the world’s future in artificial intelligence, quantum computing and other critical technologies.
To avoid this, the US must first recognize a basic truth: Taiwan is already a sovereign and democratic country. US policymakers should urgently abandon strategic ambiguity and move to a stance of clarity. Taiwan possesses all the markers of statehood — territory, people, governance — and deserves recognition as such.
Second, it should continue to defend the Taiwan Strait as international waters, with multilateral naval and diplomatic actions to affirm freedom of navigation and reject China’s attempts to redefine maritime law.
Third is the importance of secure semiconductor supply chains. The US should build diversified partnerships with Taiwan’s tech sector while bolstering, not hollowing out, the nation’s domestic capabilities.
Fourth, it should support Taiwan’s participation in global organizations, reinstating the nation’s observer status in bodies such as the WHO and the International Civil Aviation Organization, and champion its contributions.
Finally, it should promote Taiwan’s democratic story: Its transition from authoritarianism to democracy is unmatched in the Chinese-speaking world. The nation’s story can counter Beijing’s narrative and inspire other emerging democracies.
The Cold War logic that once drove the “one China policy” no longer holds. China today is not a balance against Soviet power — it is a revisionist autocracy with global ambitions.
Correcting the diplomatic isolation of Taiwan is not provocation. It is moral and strategic clarity.
Tu Hsin-fu is a Taiwanese commentator and indigenous advocate.
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS