To recalibrate its Cold War alliances, the US adopted its “one China policy,” a diplomatic compromise meant to engage with China and end the Vietnam War, but which left Taiwan in a state of permanent limbo.
Half a century later, the costs of that policy are mounting. Taiwan remains a democratic, technologically advanced nation of 23 million people, yet it is denied membership in international organizations and stripped of diplomatic recognition. Meanwhile, the PRC has weaponized the “one China” narrative to claim sovereignty over Taiwan, label the Taiwan Strait as its “internal waters” and threaten international shipping routes that carry more than 20 percent of global trade.
This is no longer just Taiwan’s problem. If China were to subjugate Taiwan, the ripple effects would endanger the global order. Taiwan produces more than 90 percent of the world’s most advanced semiconductors. Losing access to or control of that capability would derail the world’s future in artificial intelligence, quantum computing and other critical technologies.
To avoid this, the US must first recognize a basic truth: Taiwan is already a sovereign and democratic country. US policymakers should urgently abandon strategic ambiguity and move to a stance of clarity. Taiwan possesses all the markers of statehood — territory, people, governance — and deserves recognition as such.
Second, it should continue to defend the Taiwan Strait as international waters, with multilateral naval and diplomatic actions to affirm freedom of navigation and reject China’s attempts to redefine maritime law.
Third is the importance of secure semiconductor supply chains. The US should build diversified partnerships with Taiwan’s tech sector while bolstering, not hollowing out, the nation’s domestic capabilities.
Fourth, it should support Taiwan’s participation in global organizations, reinstating the nation’s observer status in bodies such as the WHO and the International Civil Aviation Organization, and champion its contributions.
Finally, it should promote Taiwan’s democratic story: Its transition from authoritarianism to democracy is unmatched in the Chinese-speaking world. The nation’s story can counter Beijing’s narrative and inspire other emerging democracies.
The Cold War logic that once drove the “one China policy” no longer holds. China today is not a balance against Soviet power — it is a revisionist autocracy with global ambitions.
Correcting the diplomatic isolation of Taiwan is not provocation. It is moral and strategic clarity.
Tu Hsin-fu is a Taiwanese commentator and indigenous advocate.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS