Vote the KMT out
Not long after the the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) was signed on June 29, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) declared that it should be regarded as a treaty and that the legislature must accept or reject the pact without making any amendments.
It has yet to be decided if the ECFA is a treaty or not. Legislative Yuan Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) stressed that, based on interpretations by the Council of Grand Justices, no cross-strait agreement can be viewed as a treaty.
It is clear that the ECFA is not a treaty, because a treaty is an agreement signed between sovereign states. The ECFA was not signed by two sovereign states, but by the Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) and the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS). These may be quasi-official bodies, but no government officials were involved in the signing. Thus, the ECFA is not a treaty. it has also been negotiated behind closed doors.
In 1949, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) declared that the Republic of China (ROC) had ceased to exist and thus Beijing refuses to recognize Ma as president of the ROC. In fact, the ECFA can be regarded as an agreement between the government of Taiwan region and the central government of China.
At first Ma regarded the ECFA as a treaty, but later changed his mind to say that although the ECFA was not a treaty it should be treated as one. He has also said that the legislature can only accept or reject the ECFA in its entirety.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has pointed to the legislature’s article-by-article reviews of free-trade agreements (FTA) with El Salvador and Honduras, the Intellectual Property Rights Protection Agreements with the American Institute in Taiwan and the Extradition Treaty with the Dominican Republic. Wang has also raised the legislature’s article-by-article reviews of international covenants signed between Taiwan and its Central American allies.
As the elected president of a democratic country, Ma should not be manipulating the legislature’s review of the ECFA. Indeed, his tactics have become frighteningly reminiscent of those used by former dictator Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石).
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has 75 legislators and controls the legislature, which is why Ma is confident it will accede to his demands and obediently pass the ECFA.
The opposition has sought to have the ECFA decided in a national referendum, twice, but both times been rejected. The DPP has no way of voting down the ECFA with only 33 seats in the legislature.
Since Ma assumed the presidency in 2008, he has skillfully collaborated with the PRC to promote his goal of unification with China. He has sacrificed Taiwan’s sovereignty, reduced the country to an “area” or “region” of China and himself to a regional head of Taiwan.
Ma said Taiwan would sign FTAs with other countries, yet Taiwan Affairs Office director Wang Yi (王毅) said China would not allowed this even after signing the ECFA. Furthermore, Taiwan has been forced by China to use the title “Chinese Taipei” on the international stage. Can “Chinese Taipei” really sign FTAs with sovereign nations?
An ECFA will gradually bind Taiwan to a Chinese common market, another step toward the extinction of a democratic and sovereign Taiwan. To prevent Ma’s unification plans, the DPP must win back the presidency in 2012.
EDWIN KUNG
Washington State
Live legislature please
Following the fighting in the legislature during the provisional session to review the ECFA (“DPP walks out of ECFA review,” July 10, page 1), Wang Jin-pyng said: “As the speaker standing on the podium, I did not hear anyone express his or her opposition [to the motion]. [In fact], I could not hear anything at all because of the chaos in front of me … If I had heard something, I would have dealt with [the opposition] in accordance with legislative procedures.”
The proceedings of the legislature should be recorded, then the video could be played back, showing the public the true facts of the case — not what the DPP or the KMT said.
So what is the truth? Having all major legislative proceedings televised live nationally would do wonders to improve the democratic process in Taiwan.
OU GENE
Taichung
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with