Embracing China’s decision to let its currency move more freely, US businesses said on Monday that the move would make it easier to compete against Chinese companies and would help reduce the US trade deficit.
They cautioned, though, that the rise in the currency, the yuan, is expected to be gradual, even if many US economists say it is between 20 percent and 40 percent undervalued.
SGI, a California company that makes servers and data storage equipment, looks forward to extra business.
“It’s a real opportunity for SGI and other American companies to expand sales to China,” said Mark Barrenechea, the chief executive. “Although this will increase some costs for American businesses that source in China, it also means that Chinese businesses can more readily afford American exports.”
Trade experts said the winners would be US companies like General Electric and Caterpillar that export to China, while companies like Wal-Mart and Target that rely on China as a low-cost export platform may be squeezed by rising costs.
In fact, costs have already been rising this year because of demands for higher wages among Chinese workers, who are balking at the coastal jobs once coveted as a way out of rural poverty.
Even though Caterpillar has tractor-making factories in China to serve the local market, the company was quick to praise the country’s decision, struck just days ahead of a crucial G20 meeting of nations. That is because along with what it produces there, Caterpillar sells China some of its most sophisticated, and therefore expensive, US-made equipment, including giant bulldozers, large mining trucks and gas turbines.
“Presumably, a stronger currency will increase their buying power, and if their economy remains strong, that will inevitably lead to more exports,” said Jim Dugan, a Caterpillar spokesman.
As China’s goods become more expensive, goods produced in the West will become relatively more attractive, not just in China, but around the world.
Fred Hochberg, chairman of the Export-Import Bank of the United States, said it was hard to predict how much China’s currency increase could bolster US exports.
“It depends on how they implement it, what rate of speed and how much it is really market-driven,” he said.
US companies and global companies that count on China to produce goods at a low cost, however, may be hurt by the currency’s rise just as they have been suffering from rising labor costs. John Frisbie, president of the United States-China Business Council, cited companies with low-end products, like apparel, shoes and toys, as among those most affected.
Wages have risen recently in China to help workers keep up with inflation and in response to labor unrest, most notably strikes at several Honda plants and 11 worker suicides at Foxconn Technology’s mammoth electronics factory in Shenzhen.
Mitch Free, chairman of MFG.com, a company based in Atlanta that helps secure manufacturing for Black & Decker, Whirlpool and Motorola, said Chinese manufacturing prices had risen by 8 percent in the last year, largely because of labor costs. He expects the trend to continue.
“They’re proactively giving some wage increases,” Free said. “We’re seeing people sending messages to the buyers, through the system, saying that they’re revising a price or can only hold a price for a short time because they’re anticipating wage increases.”
How much US exports increase depends in part on how much China allows its currency to rise. Fred Bergsten, director of the Peterson Institute for International Economics, predicted that if the yuan rose by 20 percent over the next two or three years, and if adjacent countries like Taiwan and Malaysia similarly let their currencies rise, the US would lop US$100 billion to US$150 billion a year from its current account deficit and create up to 1 million US jobs.
Most of that change would be in exports, not just exports to China, he said.
Frisbie was more skeptical about the impact on the trade deficit. Neither a stronger yuan nor higher wages would have much effect on major companies like GE or Boeing that have made large investments in China to sell to local consumers, he said.
For companies that make products in China for sale elsewhere, however, there will be an incentive to reconsider where their factories are.
“They’re the ones who are strategizing to consider other locations,” he said. “They’re the companies that will be impacted most. They’re looking at other places with low labor costs, like Vietnam.”
Other Asian countries could well let their currencies rise along with the yuan, reducing the potential benefit of transferring operations out of China.
Still, some companies may decide to continue diversifying their suppliers, said Hana Ben-Shabat, who oversees A.T. Kearney’s global-retail index.
“Companies will spread their bets among different countries instead of being so attached to getting a large proportion of their goods out of China,” she said.
She said she did not expect a wave of moves to lower-wage countries because labor costs make up only between 15 percent and 20 percent of apparel costs.
“Cost of labor in Bangladesh is way lower than China,” she said, but given other costs like shipping, “the same garment could cost much more out of Bangladesh than in China.”
At one big company, Li & Fung, which does work for Wal-Mart and Liz Claiborne, among others, the president, Bruce Rockowitz, said China was still attractive.
“This is not the end of China, but it’s the end of lower prices,” he said.
Clyde Prestowitz, president of the American Strategy Institute and author of The Betrayal of American Prosperity, said he expected no rush out of China by US companies.
“In fact, I see important guys going in, like Intel and Applied Materials,” both semiconductor manufacturers, he said. “Foreign companies are obviously concerned, but I haven’t seen anybody except Google talk seriously about getting out. It’s a big market that’s going to get bigger.”
ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY DAVID BARBOZA
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry