It is graduation season again. This year, new graduates should have more job opportunities than last because the job market has recovered somewhat since the economy emerged from last year’s recession.
However, college graduates may not feel like celebrating, as recent polls suggest new graduates will face competition for jobs from those who left school last year and can look forward to almost the same starting salary as the year before.
The latest 104 Job Bank survey showed that nearly 40 percent of students who left school last year are still out of work. The poll also warned that there is an imbalance between the supply and demand of skilled people in the jobs market.
Earlier this month, a US employment services agency said that Taiwanese employers would continue to face a shortage of talent in the coming quarter.
Manpower Inc’s global employment outlook survey said Taiwanese employers often find that the professional skills students learn at school do not meet their expectations.
Worries that new graduates may have to endure low starting salaries are not groundless. A recent poll by the online human resource Web site Yes123.com showed the average starting pay for new graduates was NT$22,624 a month this year — NT$1,185 lower than their expected salary. However, 104 Job Bank found in its survey that first-time job seekers with a bachelor’s degree average a starting salary of NT$27,652 a month this year, just NT$400 more than last year.
By all accounts, college graduates are now facing the same problem of high unemployment as high school graduates. According to the latest government statistics, the unemployment rate for college graduates was 5.52 percent in April — falling between the 5.04 percent for junior high school graduates and 5.82 percent for senior high school graduates. Overall unemployment was of 5.39 percent that month.
No wonder some prestigious companies in Singapore, Hong Kong and China have reportedly come to Taiwan recently to recruit local talent at job fairs. While Taiwan appears to play a role as an Asian talent pool, young people are being offered relatively low salaries by foreign companies in the region.
It is not surprising, then, that an increasing number of college students have in recent years expressed an interest in becoming models at car shows or product exhibitions — known as showgirls in Taiwan — and a few have even chosen to pursue careers in the entertainment industry, where they think there are better opportunities to generate a decent income and do something interesting.
At a recent graduation ceremony, National Taiwan University (NTU) president Lee Si-chen (李嗣涔) said that he hoped NTU graduates would make a more meaningful contribution to society than a job in show business.
Lee’s remark was well intended but controversial, because there is no absolute standard by which to measure the value of a career plan. However, Lee’s words did draw attention to the fact that not only does there appear to have been a change in the mindset of young people nowadays, but that Taiwan faces a serious youth employment problem — with a persistently high rate of unemployment for college graduates and low starting salaries. The challenges facing new job seekers this year are a problem government policymakers need to address urgently.
Taiwan might just give up. That’s the argument Simon Shuster made in The Atlantic’s October issue. The US is unreliable, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) leadership is aligned with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and Taiwan does not have the military capability to defend itself in a prolonged war without help. What hope does Taiwan have? Quite a bit more, in fact, than Shuster lets on. Shuster points to genuine problems. The first Donald Trump administration had a mostly positive record on Taiwan policy. It regularized the arms sales process, enhanced the military-to-military relationship, and treated Taiwan more like a normal
A Facebook post by Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) earlier this month achieved record levels of engagement — although perhaps inadvertently. In it, he attacked Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator and Taipei mayoral candidate Puma Shen (沈伯洋) for an op-ed published in 2014 discussing drug harm reduction policies. In attempting to stir up fear with talk of community centers, drugs and needles, Chiang’s comment section exploded. More than 100,000 comments poured in within the first two hours; more than 330,000 after the first 12; and more than 400,000 by noon the following day. Rather embarrassingly, many commenters made a point
Last year, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) turned the Double Ten National Day ceremony into a platform for grievances against the government. Yesterday, standing before the president and foreign dignitaries, he warned against Taiwan becoming a “false democracy, in reality a dictatorship.” Then he called for unity. Democratic leaders must tolerate criticism, even on ceremonial occasions, but Han misused his position and a national celebration to insinuate that Taiwan’s elected president was steering the country toward dictatorship and cast himself as a statesman offering reconciliation. Han asked how Taiwan’s security should be examined, using a medical analogy. If he insists on playing
Southeast Asian food delivery platform Grab Holdings Ltd in March applied to acquire Delivery Hero SE’s Foodpanda operations in Taiwan, with the Fair Trade Commission (FTC) scheduled to announce its decision on Oct. 27. On the surface, the deal is a business merger — but in substance, it involves personal data, national geospatial information and digital sovereignty. It cannot be assessed solely in terms of market share and price competition. Grab has extensive and long-standing connections to Chinese capital. In 2015, Chinese ride-hailing firm Didi Chuxing and China Investment Corp, a sovereign wealth fund, invested in Grab. Grab invested in Chinese autonomous-driving