When people talk about “bearing a cross,” they usually mean being oppressed, going to jail and suffering physical torment, so it’s surprising to hear a Taiwanese tycoon who lives in luxury and flies in a private plane saying he is “bearing a cross” because some employees at his factories in China have killed themselves. Even if he is as upset as he claims, the phrase is poorly chosen. If those workers could enjoy even 1 percent of the tycoon’s daily comforts, they probably wouldn’t want to jump off roofs.
Living in luxury and bearing crosses — this strange combination highlights how businesses investing in China are entangled in a heartless and contradictory world. On the one hand, these employers provide impoverished Chinese with employment opportunities, while on the other they rely on the Chinese government’s repressive policies to help them exploit the workers and amass great wealth for themselves.
For government and business to connive in bullying workers in a country that continues to call itself “socialist” and “communist” is the scandal of the century. While China’s so-called reforms under the successive leaderships of former Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) and Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) have been carried out in the name of “socialism,” they have created a gap between rich and poor that is wider than that of the US. Whatever social safety net China once had has been stripped away, leaving no relief from exploitation.
While the path taken under Jiang and Hu is essentially capitalist, China lacks the freedom, democracy, legal system and other checks and balances needed to keep an otherwise ruthless capitalist system in check. China lacks independent labor unions, free and fair media and a social welfare system. China’s reforms have deregulated the economy, allowing unbridled exploitation of labor, while the political system remains as rigid as ever. Independent unions are not allowed and there is no right to strike.
When a free market operates under a developed legal framework, the rules of the game are set, ideally, through a democratic process. The path to wealth depends on an individual’s ability, so it is not a sin to be rich. US software tycoon Bill Gates is wealthier than many nations alone, but he uses his wealth for philanthropy. There hasn’t been news of any Microsoft employees being abused to the point that they jump off buildings.
It is different in China, where the law counts for much less. There, you may only get rich if you have special privileges and the right connections. This is as true for overseas investors as it is for those Chinese who have made fortunes through the restructuring of state-owned enterprises.
While the rich get richer, workers live in internment camp-like conditions. Toiling day and night and selling their labor for low pay, there is no way out for them. These are the very conditions that Karl Marx predicted would lead to a workers’ revolution.
The suicides at Foxconn and strikes against low wages at Honda and elsewhere in China show that Chinese workers have had enough. The Chinese government, for its part, does not publicly dare to go on suppressing the workers and protecting employers’ interests. Rather, it is quite happy to shift the blame for exploiting workers onto overseas investors.
By conceding big wage hikes, Foxconn and Honda may be writing a new page in the history of China’s reforms. They are bringing to an end the stage in which China offered ultra-low wages. As these events unfold, Chinese workers are waking up and are now ready to break out of a contradictory system that thrives, at its core, at the expense of their rights.
James Wang is a journalist based in Washington.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng (何立峰) are expected to meet this month in Paris to prepare for a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). According to media reports, the two sides would discuss issues such as the potential purchase of Boeing aircraft by China, increasing imports of US soybeans and the latest impacts of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. However, recent US military action against Iran has added uncertainty to the Trump-Xi summit. Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) called the joint US-Israeli airstrikes and the
RSS