Betrayal of the free market
The government’s desire to sign an economic framework agreement (ECFA) with China must be vigorously resisted by anyone who cares for their freedom.
Not only is the Chinese government run on a fraudulent and malicious modus operandi, but where there should be a clear demarcation between the actions of China’s government and those of so-called “private” Chinese companies, there is nothing but the blur of fascism. If a Chinese company defrauds you, you are no longer dealing with a company that you can take to court and sue for compensation, but the customs policy of the People’s Republic of China government itself.
Yet the question is whether the same is increasingly true of Taiwan, with its blurry state-private empires in the healthcare and education markets. Is it also a trend embraced by the US under the present administration. Consider the extent of this fascistic blur in commercial banking, energy, housing, insurance, automotive and healthcare industries in the US.
Although the Taiwan Solidarity Union has pursued a referendum on an ECFA, which has garnered much support, I cannot applaud their stance. And for all the fight they are showing, I’m sure that in private, their mood remains pessimistic.
If they fail in their attempts to force the government into offering a referendum on an ECFA, then where democracy fails, only the market will be left to stand against state predation. It will be up to the Taiwanese to decide whether they accept the cost by refraining from purchasing Chinese goods and services wherever possible.
We must never surrender our freedom to the fascists in Beijing or those in Taipei. The issue is very simple and it is and will always be the same: Do you want to live by the power of the market or the power of the government? Will you choose to embrace freedom of association and exchange or will you try to live under the threat of violence if you don’t get what you want? Will you stand up in defiance of tyrants or will you grovel and whine on the floor, begging to be absolved of responsibility, like a slave?
MICHAEL FAGAN
Tainan
Give ambulances right of way
Recently, I had my second trip in an ambulance from a hospital in Taipei to a hospital in Linkou and can no longer remain silent about an appalling and dangerous situation. It concerns other drivers on the streets of Taipei and on the freeway when an ambulance is in the vicinity.
I can’t say that this behavior applies to all of Taiwan, but one would think that Taipei would perhaps be a bit more forward thinking than other areas of the country.
The problem is that most drivers are unconcerned about a speeding ambulance and its occupants. If it was a member of your family being rushed to hospital in a life-or-death situation, would you not try your best to get out of the way so the ambulance could get by as safely and as quickly as possible?
On both of my ambulance trips, my condition was not exactly a matter of life or death — I’m a cancer patient — but I remain astounded by the behavior of motorists in Taiwan. In general, Taipei is a more civilized city than it was even 10 years ago, and I’ve been living here off and on since 1983. But there’s something about peoples’ behavior when they are behind the wheel of a car, and it can’t just be because they are in a hurry.
When an ambulance is behind you with its siren wailing, how can a driver not have the presence of mind to get out of the way? On a trip that lasted perhaps 20 minutes, I counted no less than 17 cars that appeared to be totally oblivious to our presence. Yes, many drivers did the right thing and moved out of the way, but then almost immediately there was another that didn’t seem to care — even when the driver turned the siren up even louder.
Part of the problem with this issue is the lack of proper driving skills. A friend of mine from Canada recently told me that several of his Taiwanese buddies have asked him why he looks over his shoulder when he’s driving. He tells them it’s to check if there’s a car in your blind spot, but he is met with uncomprehending blank stares, as if they’ve never been told about blind spots.
I don’t want to wax indignant about this problem as I expect it will make little difference, but for anyone reading this — if you’re out driving and there is an ambulance with its siren on and you see it in your rear-view mirror — get out of the way. The life you might help save may be someone you know and love.
JOSEPH RUPP
Linkou
The image was oddly quiet. No speeches, no flags, no dramatic announcements — just a Chinese cargo ship cutting through arctic ice and arriving in Britain in October. The Istanbul Bridge completed a journey that once existed only in theory, shaving weeks off traditional shipping routes. On paper, it was a story about efficiency. In strategic terms, it was about timing. Much like politics, arriving early matters. Especially when the route, the rules and the traffic are still undefined. For years, global politics has trained us to watch the loud moments: warships in the Taiwan Strait, sanctions announced at news conferences, leaders trading
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
The saga of Sarah Dzafce, the disgraced former Miss Finland, is far more significant than a mere beauty pageant controversy. It serves as a potent and painful contemporary lesson in global cultural ethics and the absolute necessity of racial respect. Her public career was instantly pulverized not by a lapse in judgement, but by a deliberate act of racial hostility, the flames of which swiftly encircled the globe. The offensive action was simple, yet profoundly provocative: a 15-second video in which Dzafce performed the infamous “slanted eyes” gesture — a crude, historically loaded caricature of East Asian features used in Western
The Executive Yuan and the Presidential Office on Monday announced that they would not countersign or promulgate the amendments to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) passed by the Legislative Yuan — a first in the nation’s history and the ultimate measure the central government could take to counter what it called an unconstitutional legislation. Since taking office last year, the legislature — dominated by the opposition alliance of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party — has passed or proposed a slew of legislation that has stirred controversy and debate, such as extending
RSS