Betrayal of the free market
The government’s desire to sign an economic framework agreement (ECFA) with China must be vigorously resisted by anyone who cares for their freedom.
Not only is the Chinese government run on a fraudulent and malicious modus operandi, but where there should be a clear demarcation between the actions of China’s government and those of so-called “private” Chinese companies, there is nothing but the blur of fascism. If a Chinese company defrauds you, you are no longer dealing with a company that you can take to court and sue for compensation, but the customs policy of the People’s Republic of China government itself.
Yet the question is whether the same is increasingly true of Taiwan, with its blurry state-private empires in the healthcare and education markets. Is it also a trend embraced by the US under the present administration. Consider the extent of this fascistic blur in commercial banking, energy, housing, insurance, automotive and healthcare industries in the US.
Although the Taiwan Solidarity Union has pursued a referendum on an ECFA, which has garnered much support, I cannot applaud their stance. And for all the fight they are showing, I’m sure that in private, their mood remains pessimistic.
If they fail in their attempts to force the government into offering a referendum on an ECFA, then where democracy fails, only the market will be left to stand against state predation. It will be up to the Taiwanese to decide whether they accept the cost by refraining from purchasing Chinese goods and services wherever possible.
We must never surrender our freedom to the fascists in Beijing or those in Taipei. The issue is very simple and it is and will always be the same: Do you want to live by the power of the market or the power of the government? Will you choose to embrace freedom of association and exchange or will you try to live under the threat of violence if you don’t get what you want? Will you stand up in defiance of tyrants or will you grovel and whine on the floor, begging to be absolved of responsibility, like a slave?
MICHAEL FAGAN
Tainan
Give ambulances right of way
Recently, I had my second trip in an ambulance from a hospital in Taipei to a hospital in Linkou and can no longer remain silent about an appalling and dangerous situation. It concerns other drivers on the streets of Taipei and on the freeway when an ambulance is in the vicinity.
I can’t say that this behavior applies to all of Taiwan, but one would think that Taipei would perhaps be a bit more forward thinking than other areas of the country.
The problem is that most drivers are unconcerned about a speeding ambulance and its occupants. If it was a member of your family being rushed to hospital in a life-or-death situation, would you not try your best to get out of the way so the ambulance could get by as safely and as quickly as possible?
On both of my ambulance trips, my condition was not exactly a matter of life or death — I’m a cancer patient — but I remain astounded by the behavior of motorists in Taiwan. In general, Taipei is a more civilized city than it was even 10 years ago, and I’ve been living here off and on since 1983. But there’s something about peoples’ behavior when they are behind the wheel of a car, and it can’t just be because they are in a hurry.
When an ambulance is behind you with its siren wailing, how can a driver not have the presence of mind to get out of the way? On a trip that lasted perhaps 20 minutes, I counted no less than 17 cars that appeared to be totally oblivious to our presence. Yes, many drivers did the right thing and moved out of the way, but then almost immediately there was another that didn’t seem to care — even when the driver turned the siren up even louder.
Part of the problem with this issue is the lack of proper driving skills. A friend of mine from Canada recently told me that several of his Taiwanese buddies have asked him why he looks over his shoulder when he’s driving. He tells them it’s to check if there’s a car in your blind spot, but he is met with uncomprehending blank stares, as if they’ve never been told about blind spots.
I don’t want to wax indignant about this problem as I expect it will make little difference, but for anyone reading this — if you’re out driving and there is an ambulance with its siren on and you see it in your rear-view mirror — get out of the way. The life you might help save may be someone you know and love.
JOSEPH RUPP
Linkou
A Chinese diplomat’s violent threat against Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi following her remarks on defending Taiwan marks a dangerous escalation in East Asian tensions, revealing Beijing’s growing intolerance for dissent and the fragility of regional diplomacy. Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) on Saturday posted a chilling message on X: “the dirty neck that sticks itself in must be cut off,” in reference to Takaichi’s remark to Japanese lawmakers that an attack on Taiwan could threaten Japan’s survival. The post, which was later deleted, was not an isolated outburst. Xue has also amplified other incendiary messages, including one suggesting
Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) on Saturday last week shared a news article on social media about Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s remarks on Taiwan, adding that “the dirty neck that sticks itself in must be cut off.” The previous day in the Japanese House of Representatives, Takaichi said that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could constitute “a situation threatening Japan’s survival,” a reference to a legal legal term introduced in 2015 that allows the prime minister to deploy the Japan Self-Defense Forces. The violent nature of Xue’s comments is notable in that it came from a diplomat,
Before 1945, the most widely spoken language in Taiwan was Tai-gi (also known as Taiwanese, Taiwanese Hokkien or Hoklo). However, due to almost a century of language repression policies, many Taiwanese believe that Tai-gi is at risk of disappearing. To understand this crisis, I interviewed academics and activists about Taiwan’s history of language repression, the major challenges of revitalizing Tai-gi and their policy recommendations. Although Taiwanese were pressured to speak Japanese when Taiwan became a Japanese colony in 1895, most managed to keep their heritage languages alive in their homes. However, starting in 1949, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) enacted martial law
“Si ambulat loquitur tetrissitatque sicut anas, anas est” is, in customary international law, the three-part test of anatine ambulation, articulation and tetrissitation. And it is essential to Taiwan’s existence. Apocryphally, it can be traced as far back as Suetonius (蘇埃托尼烏斯) in late first-century Rome. Alas, Suetonius was only talking about ducks (anas). But this self-evident principle was codified as a four-part test at the Montevideo Convention in 1934, to which the United States is a party. Article One: “The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: a) a permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) government;
RSS