Early this year, the National Police Agency (NPA) released last year’s crime statistics showing a decline in the number of cases by more than 60,000 compared with 2008, the lowest figure in 10 years. The data also showed that Taichung City is no longer the city with the highest crime rate.
This all seems to call for celebration, if it weren’t for the fact that the public has seen no improvement in law and order. There have been frequent shootings and other criminal activities in Taichung City recently and a woman was reportedly kidnapped near the popular commercial area around National Taichung First Senior High School and sexually abused. All these events seem to contradict the NPA’s data.
The 19th century French sociologist Emile Durkheim proposed the anomie theory. It suggests that whenever a society is in a state of anomy — social instability resulting from a breakdown of social norms and values — society will enter a state of disorder and crime rates will soar.
Using Taichung City as an example, following a recent accident when a cyclist was hit and killed by a car, police were not only unable to secure the area, but also failed to block a group of men dressed in black from twice driving a car over the right leg of the dead body and harassing police officers on duty.
Such passive and weak responses from the police only serve to further encourage criminals and would-be criminals, while the public loses both confidence in the authority of the police and respect for the law. All these contribute to a state of anomy.
The more crucial issue is gangs, the main reason why Taichung City has sunk into a state of disorder. It is often called “Sin City,” a nickname that isn’t acquired overnight. If the police do not intervene forcefully when gang-managed businesses appear, more gangs will follow.
Although prominent political figures continue to announce efforts to fight the underworld, they still openly attend weddings and funerals of gang leaders as guests of honor, calling each other brothers. Sometimes, gang leaders are even nominated by political parties to run for election, thus obtaining legal protection.
The feeling of safety and social order does not depend on falling crime rates or political slogans but, rather, on whether one can safely walk down the street without being attacked.
In 2007, Taichung City began installing closed circuit television cameras at many locations to help prevent crime. However, residents care more about timely police assistance, and that is not an issue solved by installing cameras in the streets.
In the 1970s, New York City police started to patrol the streets on foot, which proved to be surprisingly effective. Everyone could see the police officers, which helped to deter illegal activity. Patrolling on foot also allowed police officers to communicate directly with local residents.
The “electronic wall” created by Taichung City, the spending large sums of money on the installation of street cameras, does not give residents a feeling of safety, nor do they do anything to maintain social order. It is easy to guess how effective, or ineffective, these cameras are.
What the public wants is very simple: They simply want freedom from fear.
Taichung Mayor Jason Hu (胡志強) has on countless occasions promised to improve social order during his eight years in office. Regardless of whether he is trying to save his candidacy in the Greater Taichung mayoral election in November or if he is displaying real concern for Taichung residents, it had better not be another political slogan.
Wu Ching-chin is an assistant professor in the department of financial and economic law at Aletheia University.
TRANSLATED BY TAIJING WU
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath