When Rafik Gindy graduated from high school, he knew he wanted to become an engineer. So he enrolled at the American University in Cairo (AUC) and prepared to immerse himself in math and science.
However, the university had a different idea.
Gindy knew what he wanted to be, but did not exactly know who he was. That was what the university wanted him to think about, in a class called the Human Quest: Exploring the Big Questions.
“I thought identity was just your name, your culture, but now I know it’s really complex,” said Gindy, a slender freshman who shook his head at that revelation.
Who am I?
What does it mean to be human?
These are the kinds of questions posed to undergraduate students entering this 90-year-old university during what the president, David Arnold, called a first year of “disorientation.” During disorientation, the students — 85 percent of them Egyptians — are taught to learn in ways quite at odds with the traditional method of teaching in this country, where instructors lecture, students memorize and tests are exercises in regurgitation.
“It’s different here because there is room for people to express themselves,” said Manar Mohsen, a junior majoring in political science and journalism. “It is not that simple outside, where it is more about conformity.”
Egypt, like much of the Arab world, demands conformity in many corners of life. Education is based on the concept of rote learning, and creativity in the classroom is often discouraged. Students at Cairo University say they memorize and recite, never analyze and hypothesize.
So the idea of a liberal arts education aimed at developing critical thinking skills is often new to the students. That can make for a difficult transition. Plagiarism is often a problem at both the undergraduate and graduate levels, officials here said, because the students — more accustomed to rote learning — see nothing wrong with spitting back someone else’s work and have never been held to rigorous academic standards.
“For a lot of the kids here, the idea that you are supposed to have your own ideas is a novelty,” said Lisa Anderson, the university provost, who is on leave from Columbia University. “There was nothing in their previous education that would have exposed them to these standards.”
American University is a private, elite school, although university officials sometimes recoil at the elite label. Yet, the school is expensive and so is generally out of reach for all but the wealthiest families and a handful of scholarship students.
Tuition and fees for Egyptian students run about US$19,600 a year, a princely sum in a country where about half the population lives on about US$2 a day.
The campus exudes affluence. Students joke about the “Gucci Corridor,” a spot where well-coiffed students gather each afternoon. There is no cafeteria, only expensive fast food stands.
“We are all rich and spoiled,” said one student, upset that many of her classmates were not more politically aware.
However, in some respects, the elite label is a strength. American University plays a central role as a sort of intellectual boot camp for young people who will become leaders in government and the economy.
“If we teach the elite to be good citizens, that’s not a bad thing,” Anderson said.
Nabil Fahmy, the former longtime ambassador to the US, said that during his nine years in Washington, at least 40 percent of the embassy staff members were American University graduates, as was he.
The university was founded in 1919 by a group of Presbyterian missionaries. Unlike the satellite campuses of prestigious US universities in oil-rich Persian Gulf states, it is quite homegrown and often reflects the community around it.
The university was originally in Tahrir Square, in the center of Cairo, a hyper-urban landscape where the air is thick, the din overwhelming and the mosaic of Egyptian life is on every corner. That was part of the university’s appeal.
However, over the years it has grown and now serves 5,000 undergraduates on an architecturally inspiring, if geographically isolated, US$400 million, 105-hectare campus in a suburb called New Cairo. Instead of urban grime the campus is surrounded by villas and developments with names such as Golden Heights.
The location redefined the university just as it was beginning to redefine itself as a first-rate university rather than a finishing school for Egypt’s elite. However, as the school has grown, so has a conflict within the university itself: Can it change its mission while retaining its liberal arts core and preserving classes such as the Big Questions?
Some say it needs to move away from that way of thinking.
“We are moving more and more into professional schools, like business, engineering, sciences,” said Fahmy, who is the founding dean of a new school of global affairs and public policy.
“The challenge we have now is we have moved from a small college that thought it was a university, to a university that has to change its thinking from being a small college,” he said, defining a view that is anathema to some others on campus.
There are other pressures, too, coming from a society that holds engineers in such high esteem that the profession is also a courtesy title, like doctor.
“The humanities in general, and philosophy specifically, are seen as either frivolous or, at the very least, not financially prudent, by many of the very people who seek what makes AUC unique,” said Nathaniel Bowditch, an assistant professor of philosophy.
Bowditch said, “learning how to think rather than what to think prepares a person for all professions,” and without that, “the academy becomes nothing more than a trade school.”
For now, the university leadership says it remains committed to its core mission, and will continue to ensure that incoming Egyptian students relearn how to learn, officials said.
“We want our students to be imaginative in their fields,” Anderson said.
So for the time being, at least, the Big Questions class remains safe, which seems to suit the students just fine.
“I took the course because my brother took it two years ago,” Gindy said. “I like how it explained things we never knew, like how the world began.”
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength