The Japanese just don’t get it.
No, that’s not quite right. Rather, it should be said that Japanese Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama and his inexperienced partners in a hapless coalition just don’t understand that they have severely damaged the trust between their government and the administration of US President Barack Obama. In so doing, they have blithely ignored the serious harm they have done to the security of their own country.
A telling clue: When Hatoyama was in Washington for the nuclear summit last month, he was limited to a 10 minute talk with Obama — and that during a state dinner. This was evidently the first time a Japanese prime minister visiting the US did not have a full meeting with the US president since then-president Harry Truman and Japanese prime minister Shigeru Yoshida signed the peace treaty in San Francisco in 1951 to end World War II.
Hatoyama has caused this breakdown by single-handedly tearing up a 2006 agreement worked out by Japanese and US negotiators over 13 years of tedious exchanges. It was intended to ease frictions generated by the US military presence in Okinawa.
US troops have been on the island since they captured it during World War II.
Specifically, a US Marine air station at Futenma, in the middle of a crowded city, was to be moved to a less populated area and 17,000 Marines, civilian staff, and dependents were to be shipped to Guam. Land in Okinawa used by the US now was to be returned to its Okinawan owners as bases were consolidated.
Hatoyama’s reneging on that carefully wrought agreement has violated a long-standing international practice in which agreements made by a particular government are considered binding on successive governments. In this case, Hatoyama has called into question his intention to honor diplomatic agreements, not only with the US but with other nations.
Hatoyama and his ministers have been flailing about as they have sought a revised base plan that would be acceptable to the US, the Okinawans and various political factions in Tokyo. For weeks, Japan’s newspapers have floated one idea after another, each from a different politician and none seeming to point to a solution.
Moreover, Hatoyama has appeared incapable of political leadership. On April 25, 90,000 to 100,000 Okinawans demonstrated to demand that the Marine air station be moved elsewhere, preferably off their island. Hatoyama and his cronies stood by, neither supporting the demonstrators nor telling them they were wrong.
At the bottom of this dispute are two contradictory elements: The presence of US military forces on Japanese soil and the dependence of Japan on the US for its national security.
No nation has long welcomed foreign troops on its sovereign territory, no matter the reason. In this instance, that is compounded by the disparity between Japanese and US cultures and the difficulty of communicating when the Japanese and English languages are so different.
At the same time, the Japanese live in a hostile neighborhood. Chinese leaders see Japan as a dangerous competitor. Koreans, South and North alike, make little effort to hide their dislike of the Japanese. Russia has been a foe for at least 150 years. Only Taiwan would be friends with Japan, but the Taiwanese must tread carefully lest China become belligerent.
Only the US offers Japan a defense against both conventional and nuclear attack, a conclusion supported by most of a small cadre of Japanese strategic thinkers. In recent years, their refrain has been that Japan should show more independence in foreign policy — but within the context of the alliance with the US.
Those US forces in Okinawa provide the bona fides of that US commitment.
Richard Halloran is a freelance writer in Hawaii.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations